Lune

EMNLP2022Top-tier venue

Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionality

Anuj Diwan, Layne Berry, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath, Kyle Mahowald

2022Year
15Citations
23Top-tier citations

Abstract

Recent visuolinguistic pre-trained models show promising progress on various end tasks such as image retrieval and video captioning. Yet, they fail miserably on the recently proposed Winoground dataset (Thrush et al., 2022) , which challenges models to match paired images and English captions, with items constructed to overlap lexically but differ in meaning (e.g., "there is a mug in some grass" vs. "there is some grass in a mug"). By annotating the dataset using new fine-grained tags, we show that solving the Winoground task requires not just compositional language understanding, but a host of other abilities like commonsense reasoning or locating small, out-of-focus objects in low-resolution images. In this paper, we identify the dataset's main challenges through a suite of experiments on related tasks (probing task, image retrieval task), data augmentation, and manual inspection of the dataset. Our analysis suggests that a main challenge in visuolinguistic models may lie in fusing visual and textual representations, rather than in compositional language understanding. We release our annotation and code at https://github. com/ajd12342/why-winoground-hard .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext be0fd220-d1db-4e61-8b1b-c73ef9c23276

Cited by top-tier papers23

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on12

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines