When and Why Vision-Language Models Behave like Bags-Of-Words, and What to Do About It?
Mert Yüksekgönül, Federico Bianchi, Pratyusha Kalluri, Dan Jurafsky, James Zou
Abstract
Despite the use of large vision and language models (VLMs) in many downstream applications, it is unclear how well they encode the compositional relationships between objects and attributes. Here, we create the Attribution, Relation, and Order (ARO) benchmark to systematically evaluate the ability of VLMs to understand different types of relationships, attributes, and order information. ARO consists of Visual Genome Attribution, to test the understanding of objects' properties; Visual Genome Relation, to test for relational understanding; and COCO-Order & Flickr30k-Order, to test for order sensitivity in VLMs. ARO is orders of magnitude larger than previous benchmarks of compositionality, with more than 50,000 test cases. We present the settings in which state-of-the-art VLMs behave like bagsof-words-i.e. when they have poor relational understanding, can blunder when linking objects to their attributes, and demonstrate a severe lack of order sensitivity. VLMs are predominantly trained and evaluated on large scale datasets with rich compositional structure in the images and captions. Yet, training on these datasets has not been enough to address the lack of compositional understanding, and evaluating on these datasets has failed to surface this deficiency. To understand why these limitations emerge and are not represented in the standard tests, we zoom into the training and evaluation procedures. We demonstrate that it is possible to perform well on image-text retrieval over existing datasets without using the composition and order information. This further motivates the value of using ARO to benchmark VLMs. Given that contrastive pretraining optimizes for retrieval on large datasets with similar shortcuts, we hypothesize that this can explain why the models do not need to learn to represent compositional information. This finding suggests a natural solution: composition-aware hard negative mining. We show that a simple-to-implement modification of contrastive learning significantly improves the performance on tasks requiring an understanding of order and compositionality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c19ba716-f8b3-4137-a203-e00fa02a77f5Cited by top-tier papers207
- Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMsPeter Tong, Ellis Brown, Penghao Wu, Sanghyun Woo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,004 citations
- On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language ModelsYunqing Zhao, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Xiao Yang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 404 citations
- StableRep: Synthetic Images from Text-to-Image Models Make Strong Visual Representation LearnersYonglong Tian, Lijie Fan, Phillip Isola, Huiwen Chang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 251 citations
- Linguistic Binding in Diffusion Models: Enhancing Attribute Correspondence through Attention Map AlignmentRoyi Rassin, Eran Hirsch, Daniel Glickman, Shauli Ravfogel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 212 citations
- TMR: Text-to-Motion Retrieval Using Contrastive 3D Human Motion SynthesisMathis Petrovich, Michael J. Black, Gül VarolICCV 2023 · 192 citations
Builds on20
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot LearningJean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 6,707 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
Related papers
- Investigating Compositional Challenges in Vision-Language Models for Visual GroundingYunan Zeng, Yan Huang, Jinjin Zhang, Zequn Jie et al.CVPR 2024 · 4 citations
- Teaching CLIP to Count to TenRoni Paiss, Ariel Ephrat, Omer Tov, Shiran Zada et al.ICCV 2023 · 196 citations
- CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language ModelsSreyan Ghosh, Ashish Seth, Sonal Kumar, Utkarsh Tyagi et al.ICLR 2024 · 53 citations
- @ CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?Zixian Ma, Jerry Hong, Mustafa Omer Gul, Mona Gandhi et al.CVPR 2023
- Learning Visual Composition through Improved Semantic GuidanceAustin Stone, Hagen Soltau, Robert Geirhos, Xi Yi et al.CVPR 2025
