A Unified Framework for Provably Efficient Algorithms to Estimate Shapley Values
Tyler Chen, Akshay Seshadri, Mattia Jacopo Villani, Pradeep Niroula, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Archan Ray, Pranav Deshpande, Romina Yalovetzky, Marco Pistoia, Niraj Kumar
Abstract
Shapley values have emerged as a critical tool for explaining which features impact the decisions made by machine learning models. However, computing exact Shapley values is difficult, generally requiring an exponential (in the feature dimension) number of model evaluations. To address this, many model-agnostic randomized estimators have been developed, the most influential and widely used being the KernelSHAP method (Lundberg & Lee, 2017). While related estimators such as unbiased KernelSHAP (Covert & Lee, 2021) and LeverageSHAP (Musco & Witter, 2025) are known to satisfy theoretical guarantees, bounds for KernelSHAP have remained elusive. We describe a broad and unified framework that encompasses KernelSHAP and related estimators constructed using both with and without replacement sampling strategies. We then prove strong non-asymptotic theoretical guarantees that apply to all estimators from our framework. This provides, to the best of our knowledge, the first theoretical guarantees for KernelSHAP and sheds further light on tradeoffs between existing estimators. Through comprehensive benchmarking on small and medium dimensional datasets for Decision-Tree models, we validate our approach against exact Shapley values, consistently achieving low mean squared error with modest sample sizes. Furthermore, we make specific implementation improvements to enable scalability of our methods to high-dimensional datasets. Our methods, tested on datasets such MNIST and CIFAR10, provide consistently better results compared to the KernelSHAP library.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bda0b592-c8b9-49f0-9658-a8bb941f8721Cited by top-tier papers2
- Regression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic ValuesR. Teal Witter, Yurong Liu, Christopher MuscoNeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Adalina: Adaptive Linear Approximation for the Shapley Value and BeyondWeida Li, Yaoliang Yu, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICML 2026
Builds on7
- FastSHAP: Real-Time Shapley Value EstimationNeil Jethani, Mukund Sudarshan, Ian Connick Covert, Su-In Lee et al.ICLR 2022 · 186 citations
- Shapley explainability on the data manifoldChristopher Frye, Damien de Mijolla, Tom Begley, Laurence Cowton et al.ICLR 2021 · 125 citations
- Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley valuesBrian D. Williamson, Jean FengICML 2020 · 86 citations
- WeightedSHAP: analyzing and improving Shapley based feature attributionsYongchan Kwon, James Y. ZouNeurIPS 2022 · 60 citations
- KernelSHAP-IQ: Weighted Least Square Optimization for Shapley InteractionsFabian Fumagalli, Maximilian Muschalik, Patrick Kolpaczki, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
Related papers
- Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score SamplingChristopher Musco, R. Teal WitterICLR 2025
- PolySHAP: Extending KernelSHAP with Interaction-Informed Polynomial RegressionFabian Fumagalli, R. Teal Witter, Christopher MuscoICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- ReX: A Framework for Incorporating Temporal Information in Model-Agnostic Local Explanation TechniquesJunhao Liu, Xin ZhangAAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex ModelsTom Heskes, Evi Sijben, Ioan Gabriel Bucur, Tom ClaassenNeurIPS 2020 · 235 citations
- Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural NetworksDavid Boetius, Shahaf Bassan, Guy Katz, Stefan Leue et al.ICML 2026
