A Cost-Effective LLM-based Approach to Identify Wildlife Trafficking in Online Marketplaces
Juliana Silva Barbosa, Ulhas Gondhali, Gohar Petrossian, Kinshuk Sharma, Sunandan Chakraborty, Jennifer Jacquet, Juliana Freire
Abstract
Wildlife trafficking remains a critical global issue, significantly impacting biodiversity, ecological stability, and public health. Despite efforts to combat this illicit trade, the rise of e-commerce platforms has made it easier to sell wildlife products, putting new pressure on wild populations of endangered and threatened species. The use of these platforms also opens a new opportunity: as criminals sell wildlife products online, they leave digital traces of their activity that can provide insights into trafficking activities as well as how they can be disrupted. The challenge lies in finding these traces. Online marketplaces publish ads for a plethora of products, and identifying ads for wildlife-related products is like finding a needle in a haystack. Learning classifiers can automate ad identification, but creating them requires costly, time-consuming data labeling that hinders support for diverse ads and research questions. This paper addresses a critical challenge in the data science pipeline for wildlife trafficking analytics: generating quality labeled data for classifiers that select relevant data. While large language models (LLMs) can directly label advertisements, doing so at scale is prohibitively expensive. We propose a cost-effective strategy that leverages LLMs to generate pseudo labels for a small sample of the data and uses these labels to create specialized classification models. Our novel method automatically gathers diverse and representative samples to be labeled while minimizing the labeling costs. Our experimental evaluation shows that our classifiers achieve up to 95% F1 score, outperforming LLMs at a lower cost. We present real use cases that demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in enabling analyses of different aspects of wildlife trafficking. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies → Active learning settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd650beb-c151-4219-bf8b-c796da018f51Cited by top-tier papers2
- Analyzing Uncertainty of LLM-as-a-Judge: Interval Evaluations with Conformal PredictionHuanxin Sheng, Xinyi Liu, Hangfeng He, Jieyu Zhao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- AGRAG: Advanced Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMsYubo Wang, Haoyang Li, Fei Teng, Lei ChenICDE 2026
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
- FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill SetsSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang et al.ICLR 2024 · 176 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Raw Bytes: Towards Large Malware Language ModelsLuke Kurlandski, Harel Berger, Yin Pan, Matthew WrightNDSS 2026 · 5 citations
- Provably Robust Multi-bit Watermarking for AI-generated TextWenjie Qu, Wengrui Zheng, Tianyang Tao, Dong Yin et al.USENIX Security 2025
- HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination DetectionXuefeng Du, Chaowei Xiao, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
- IDTraffickers: An Authorship Attribution Dataset to link and connect Potential Human-Trafficking Operations on Text Escort AdvertisementsVageesh Saxena, Benjamin Bashpole, Gijs van Dijck, Gerasimos SpanakisEMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Making Large Language Models Better Data CreatorsDong-Ho Lee, Jay Pujara, Mohit Sewak, Ryen White et al.EMNLP 2023 · 13 citations
