Analyzing Uncertainty of LLM-as-a-Judge: Interval Evaluations with Conformal Prediction

LLM-as-a-judge has become a promising paradigm for using large language models (LLMs) to evaluate natural language generation (NLG), but the uncertainty of its evaluation remains underexplored.This lack of reliability may limit its deployment in many applications.This work presents the first framework to analyze the uncertainty by offering a prediction interval of LLM-based scoring via conformal prediction.Conformal prediction constructs continuous prediction intervals from a single evaluation run, and we design an ordinal boundary adjustment for discrete rating tasks.We also suggest a midpoint-based score within the interval as a low-bias alternative to raw model score and weighted average.We perform extensive experiments and analysis, which show that conformal prediction can provide valid prediction interval with coverage guarantees.We also explore the usefulness of interval midpoint and judge reprompting for better judgment. 1 LLM-as-a-judge: Rate an evaluation and output logits 1. You'll be provided with a task to evaluate.These are the introduction, criteria and evaluation steps: ... ... 2. The task for you to evaluate is as follows: ... ..