Making Large Language Models Better Data Creators
Dong-Ho Lee, Jay Pujara, Mohit Sewak, Ryen White, Sujay Kumar Jauhar
Abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) have advanced the state-of-the-art in NLP significantly, deploying them for downstream applications is still challenging due to cost, responsiveness, control, or concerns around privacy and security. As such, trainable models are still the preferred option in some cases. However, these models still require human-labeled data for optimal performance, which is expensive and time-consuming to obtain. In order to address this issue, several techniques to reduce human effort involve labeling or generating data using LLMs. Although these methods are effective for certain applications, in practice they encounter difficulties in real-world scenarios. Labeling data requires careful data selection, while generating data necessitates task-specific prompt engineering. In this paper, we propose a unified data creation pipeline that requires only a single formatting example, and which is applicable to a broad range of tasks, including traditionally problematic ones with semantically devoid label spaces. In our experiments we demonstrate that instruction-following LLMs are highly cost-effective data creators, and that models trained with these data exhibit performance better than those trained with human-labeled data (by up to 17.5%) on out-of-distribution evaluation, while maintaining comparable performance on in-distribution tasks. These results have important implications for the robustness of NLP systems deployed in the real-world.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d523a581-a325-428f-a521-c186e2a9586bCited by top-tier papers6
- Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM AgentsAdyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2024 · 30 citations
- Towards Enhanced Immersion and Agency for LLM-based Interactive DramaHongqiu Wu, Weiqi Wu, Tianyang Xu, Jiameng Zhang et al.ACL 2025 · 7 citations
- Replay Failures as Successes: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Instruction FollowingKongcheng Zhang, QI YAO, Shunyu Liu, Wenjian Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- On the Necessity of World Knowledge for Mitigating Missing Labels in Extreme ClassificationJatin Prakash, Anirudh Buvanesh, Bishal Santra, Deepak Saini et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
- ES-MemEval: Benchmarking Conversational Agents on Personalized Long-Term Emotional SupportTiantian Chen, Jiaqi Lu, Ying Shen, Lin ZhangWWW 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
Related papers
- Generating Data for Symbolic Language with Large Language ModelsJiacheng Ye, Chengzu Li, Lingpeng Kong, Tao YuEMNLP 2023 · 8 citations
- The Synergy of LLMs & RL Unlocks Offline Learning of Generalizable Language-Conditioned Policies with Low-fidelity DataThomas Pouplin, Kasia Kobalczyk, Hao Sun, Mihaela van der SchaarICML 2025
- Robust Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models Against Distribution ShiftsMoxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yixin Cao et al.EMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction FollowingZhiyuan Zeng, Jiatong Yu, Tianyu Gao, Yu Meng et al.ICLR 2024 · 299 citations
- A Rigorous Evaluation of LLM Data Generation Strategies for Low-Resource LanguagesTatiana Anikina, Ján Cegin, Jakub Simko, Simon OstermannEMNLP 2025
