ES-MemEval: Benchmarking Conversational Agents on Personalized Long-Term Emotional Support
Tiantian Chen, Jiaqi Lu, Ying Shen, Lin Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential as conversational agents. Yet, their effectiveness remains limited by deficiencies in robust long-term memory—particularly in complex, long-term Web-based services such as online emotional support. However, existing long-term dialogue benchmarks primarily focus on static and explicit fact retrieval, failing to evaluate agents in these critical scenarios where user information is dispersed, implicit, and continuously evolving. To address this gap, we introduce ES-MemEval, a comprehensive benchmark that systematically evaluates five core memory capabilities—information extraction, temporal reasoning, conflict detection, abstention, and user modeling—in long-term emotional support scenarios, covering question answering, summarization, and dialogue generation tasks. To support the benchmark, we also propose EvoEmo, the first multi-session dataset for personalized long-term emotional support scenarios, capturing fragmented, implicit user disclosures and evolving user states. Extensive experiments on open-source long-context, commercial, and retrieval-augmented (RAG) LLMs reveal that explicit long-term memory is essential to reduce hallucinations and enable effective personalization. At the same time, RAG enhances factual consistency but struggles with temporal dynamics and evolving user states. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of current paradigms, encouraging the development of more robust memory–retrieval integration in long-term personalized dialogue systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c1460486-15cb-46f5-bc9d-763aca0c7e5eBuilds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term MemoryWanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye et al.AAAI 2024 · 394 citations
Related papers
- LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive MemoryDi Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- Mem-Gallery: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Conversational Memory for MLLM AgentsYuanchen Bei, Tianxin Wei, Xuying Ning, Yanjun Zhao et al.ACL 2026 · 23 citations
- Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn InteractionsYuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuleyICLR 2026 · 246 citations
- In Prospect and Retrospect: Reflective Memory Management for Long-term Personalized Dialogue AgentsZhen Tan, Jun Yan, I-Hung Hsu, Rujun Han et al.ACL 2025
- Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMsSiyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika et al.ICLR 2025
