LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory
Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, Dong Yu
Abstract
Recent large language model (LLM)-driven chat assistant systems have integrated memory components to track user-assistant chat histories, enabling more accurate and personalized responses. However, their long-term memory capabilities in sustained interactions remain underexplored. We introduce LONGMEMEVAL, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate five core long-term memory abilities of chat assistants: information extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates, and abstention. With 500 meticulously curated questions embedded within freely scalable user-assistant chat histories, LONGMEMEVAL presents a significant challenge to existing long-term memory systems, with commercial chat assistants and long-context LLMs showing a 30% accuracy drop on memorizing information across sustained interactions. We then present a unified framework that breaks down the long-term memory design into three stages: indexing, retrieval, and reading. Built upon key experimental insights, we propose several memory design optimizations including session decomposition for value granularity, fact-augmented key expansion for indexing, and time-aware query expansion for refining the search scope. Extensive experiments show that these optimizations greatly improve both memory recall and downstream question answering on LONGMEMEVAL. Overall, our study provides valuable resources and guidance for advancing the long-term memory capabilities of LLM-based chat assistants, paving the way toward more personalized and reliable conversational AI. Our benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/xiaowu0162/LongMemEval . INTRODUCTION Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities in solving diverse tasks through natural language, leading to numerous successful chat assistant applications (OpenAI, 2022; Microsoft, 2023). Nevertheless, LLMs face limitations on tasks relying heavily on personal knowledge accumulated through long-term user-AI interactions, such as psychological counseling or secretarial duties (Zhong et al., 2024) . Failing to incorporate user background and preferences into responses can diminish the response's accuracy as well as user satisfaction. To personalize LLM-based assistants, long-term memory, the ability to memorize, recall, and reason with a long interaction history, is indispensable. Recently, several commercial (OpenAI, 2024; Coze, 2024) and open-source assistant systems with memory (Zhong et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024) have been introduced. These systems leverage techniques like compressing, indexing, and retrieving from chat histories to generate more accurate and personalized responses. Despite these advances, there has been limited progress in holistically evaluating the memory capability in long-term interactions. While several benchmarks evaluate LLMs on understanding long chat histories (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers46
- Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn InteractionsYuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuleyICLR 2026 · 246 citations
- ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning MemorySiru Ouyang, Jun Yan, I-Hung Hsu, Yanfei Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 244 citations
- MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon AgentsZijian Zhou, Ao Qu, Zhaoxuan Wu, Sunghwan Kim et al.ICLR 2026 · 223 citations
- LightMem: Lightweight and Efficient Memory-Augmented GenerationJizhan Fang, Xinle Deng, Haoming Xu, Ziyan Jiang et al.ICLR 2026 · 162 citations
- Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement LearningSikuan Yan, Xiufeng Yang, Zuchao Huang, Ercong Nie et al.ACL 2026 · 140 citations
Builds on22
- Reformer: The Efficient TransformerNikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, Anselm LevskayaICLR 2020 · 2,878 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Learning to Compress Prompts with Gist TokensJesse Mu, Xiang Li, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2023 · 488 citations
- RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized RetrievalParth Sarthi, Salman Abdullah, Aditi Tuli, Shubh Khanna et al.ICLR 2024 · 460 citations
Related papers
- ES-MemEval: Benchmarking Conversational Agents on Personalized Long-Term Emotional SupportTiantian Chen, Jiaqi Lu, Ying Shen, Lin ZhangWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- PersonaVLM: Long-Term Personalized Multimodal LLMsChang Nie, Chaoyou Fu, Yifan Zhang, Haihua Yang et al.CVPR 2026 · 11 citations
- PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?Sidharth Pulipaka, Oliver Chen, Manas Sharma, Taaha Saleem Bajwa et al.ICML 2026
- Beyond a Million Tokens: Benchmarking and Enhancing Long-Term Memory in LLMsMohammad Tavakoli, Alireza Salemi, Carrie Ye, Mohamed Abdalla et al.ICLR 2026 · 56 citations
- Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMsSiyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika et al.ICLR 2025
