SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models
Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych
Abstract
Spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning. To support our study, we created and contribute a novel Spatial Reasoning Characterization (SpaRC) framework and Spatial Reasoning Paths (SpaRP) 1 datasets, to enable an in-depth understanding of the spatial relations and compositions as well as the usefulness of spatial reasoning chains. We found that all the stateof-the-art LLMs do not perform well on the datasets-their performances are consistently low across different setups. The spatial reasoning capability improves substantially as model sizes scale up. Finetuning both large language models (e.g., Llama-2-70B) and smaller ones (e.g., Llama-2-13B) can significantly improve their F1-scores by 7-32 absolute points. We also found that the top proprietary LLMs still significantly outperform their open-source counterparts in topological spatial understanding and reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd51a7db-7d0e-4dc6-8970-c89d3476d594Cited by top-tier papers4
- USTBench: Benchmarking and Dissecting Spatiotemporal Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs as Urban AgentsSiqi Lai, Yansong Ning, Zirui Yuan, Zhixi Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward ModellingMd Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna GurevychAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- iVISPAR - An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMsJulius Mayer, Mohamad Ballout, Serwan Jassim, Farbod Nosrat Nezami et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- FoREST: Frame of Reference Evaluation in Spatial Reasoning TasksTanawan Premsri, Parisa KordjamshidiEMNLP 2025
Builds on8
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought ReasoningZhan Ling, Yunhao Fang, Xuanlin Li, Zhiao Huang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 234 citations
Related papers
- TopViewRS: Vision-Language Models as Top-View Spatial ReasonersChengzu Li, Caiqi Zhang, Han Zhou, Nigel Collier et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- SpatialReasoner: Towards Explicit and Generalizable 3D Spatial ReasoningWufei Ma, Yu-Cheng Chou, Qihao Liu, Xingrui Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 77 citations
- Is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Delving Into Spatial Reasoning for Vision Language ModelsJiayu Wang, Yifei Ming, Zhenmei Shi, Vibhav Vineet et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 166 citations
- Can Multimodal Large Language Models Understand Spatial Relations?Jingping Liu, Ziyan Liu, Zhedong Cen, Yan Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 16 citations
- SpatiaLab: Can Vision-Language Models Perform Spatial Reasoning in the Wild?Azmine Toushik Wasi, Wahid Faisal, Abdur Rahman, Mahfuz Ahmed Anik et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
