SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling
Md Imbesat Hassan Rizvi, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych
Abstract
Process or step-wise supervision has played a crucial role in advancing complex multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, efficient, high-quality automated process annotation remains a significant challenge. To address this, we introduce Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE), a novel structured framework that enables efficient per-step annotation by jointly aligning solution steps to reference solutions and determine its accuracy with explicit reasoning in single generation. We demonstrate SPARE's effectiveness across four diverse datasets spanning mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, MATH), multi-hop question answering (MuSiQue-Ans), and spatial reasoning (SpaRP), showing consistent improvements in two applications: (1) training Process Reward Models (PRMs) for ranking and aggregating multiple generations, and (2) fine-tuning models via offline reinforcement learning for greedy decoding. On PROCESSBENCH, SPARE demonstrates data-efficient out-of-distribution generalization, using only 16% of training samples compared to human-labeled and other synthetically trained baselines. Additionally, it achieves competitive performance with MCTS-based methods while offering 2.3x speedup in terms of total token count. Manual analysis reveals complementary precision-recall characteristics with MCTS approaches, suggesting potential for ensemble methods. These results establish SPARE as a practical and scalable solution for automatic process supervision in LLM reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 38a349c8-4bf6-4a95-b7fb-2ea8a7d6a1f2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
Related papers
- Training Large Language Models for Reasoning through Reverse Curriculum Reinforcement LearningZhiheng Xi, Wenxiang Chen, Boyang Hong, Senjie Jin et al.ICML 2024 · 70 citations
- R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward ModelingShuaijie She, Junxiao Liu, Yifeng Liu, Jiajun Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- Find Tailored Step Example for Next Step: a Targeted Step-wise Retrieval Framework for Guiding LLM ReasoningCheng Yang, Zhenya Huang, Liyang He, Weibo Gao et al.KDD 2026
- SCAN: Self-Denoising Monte Carlo Annotation for Robust Process Reward LearningYuyang Ding, Xinyu Shi, Juntao Li, Xiaobo Liang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- SPC: Evolving Self-Play Critic via Adversarial Games for LLM ReasoningJiaqi Chen, Bang Zhang, Ruotian Ma, Peisong Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
