Semantic-Eval : A Semantic Comprehension Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models Generation without Training
Shusheng Li, Jiale Li, Yifei Qu, Xinwei Shi, Yanliang Guo, Ziyi He, Yubo Wang, Wenjun Tan
Abstract
With the increasing prominence of large language models (LLMs), evaluating their textgeneration capabilities has become an essential research challenge. Although LLM-based evaluation methods exhibit robust performance, the inherent stochastic nature of the LLM generation process introduces a degree of uncertainty in alignment with human preferences. To address this limitation, we propose Semantic-Eval, the first training-free framework designed to assess LLM-generated text based on semantic understanding. This framework computes semantic similarity between pairwise texts to evaluate the interdependence of semantic units, integrating a graph-based weighting mechanism to account for the differential contributions of individual sentences. A pre-trained natural language inference (NLI) model is also incorporated to mitigate potential semantic relationship biases. We evaluate Semantic-Eval across eight datasets that encompass four common NLP tasks. The experimental results indicate that Semantic-Eval surpasses traditional N-gram and BERT-based evaluation metrics, aligning more closely with human judgments and demonstrating a higher correlation than smaller LLMs. However, it slightly lags behind GPT-4. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of Semantic-Eval in evaluating the generation quality of 13 large language models. The code is publicly available at 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bce6e73a-3dac-492c-a551-3dc9d12a0b41Builds on18
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
Related papers
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and InterpretabilityXinyu Hu, Li Lin, Mingqi Gao, Xunjian Yin et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?David Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi LeeACL 2023 · 254 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and ChallengesZhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language ModelsWeixi Tong, Tianyi ZhangEMNLP 2024 · 25 citations
