Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability
Xinyu Hu, Li Lin, Mingqi Gao, Xunjian Yin, Xiaojun Wan
Abstract
The evaluation of natural language generation (NLG) tasks is a significant and longstanding research area. With the recent emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs), some studies have turned to LLM-based automatic evaluation methods, which demonstrate great potential to become a new evaluation paradigm following traditional string-based and model-based metrics. However, despite the improved performance of existing methods, they still possess some deficiencies, such as dependency on references and limited evaluation flexibility. Therefore, in this paper, we meticulously construct a large-scale NLG evaluation corpus NLG-Eval with annotations from both human and GPT-4 to alleviate the lack of relevant data in this field. Furthermore, we propose Themis, an LLM dedicated to NLG evaluation, which has been trained with our designed multi-perspective consistency verification and rating-oriented preference alignment methods. Themis can conduct flexible and interpretable evaluations without references, and it exhibits superior evaluation performance on various NLG tasks, simultaneously generalizing well to unseen tasks and surpassing other evaluation models, including GPT-4.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7212d801-7e53-4948-b538-acedd95fbffcCited by top-tier papers9
- From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgeDawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 37 citations
- Beyond the Surface: Enhancing LLM-as-a-Judge Alignment with Human via Internal RepresentationsPeng Lai, Jianjie Zheng, Sijie Cheng, Yun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
- Evaluating Text Creativity across Diverse Domains: a Dataset and Large Language Model EvaluatorQian Cao, Xiting Wang, Yuzhuo Yuan, Yahui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following EvaluationBosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Direct Judgement Preference OptimizationPeifeng Wang, Austin Xu, Yilun Zhou, Caiming Xiong et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on29
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and ChallengesZhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 17 citations
- A Dual-Perspective NLG Meta-Evaluation Framework with Automatic Benchmark and Better InterpretabilityXinyu Hu, Mingqi Gao, Li Lin, Zhenghan Yu et al.ACL 2025
- On Evaluating LLM Alignment by Evaluating LLMs as JudgesYixin Liu, Pengfei Liu, Arman CohanNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- HypoEval: Hypothesis-Guided Evaluation for Natural Language GenerationMingxuan Li, Hanchen Li, Chenhao TanACL 2026 · 1 citation
