Lune

CHI2020Top-tier venue

Examining Design Choices of Questionnaires in VR User Studies

Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Susanne Putze, Michael Bonfert, Sebastian Höffner, Pitt Michelmann, Dirk Wenig, Rainer Malaka, Jan David Smeddinck

2020Year
80Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

Questionnaires are among the most common research tools in virtual reality (VR) user studies. Transitioning from virtuality to reality for giving self-reports on VR experiences can lead to systematic biases. VR allows to embed questionnaires into the virtual environment which may ease participation and avoid biases. To provide a cohesive picture of methods and design choices for questionnaires in VR (inVRQ), we discuss 15 inVRQ studies from the literature and present a survey with 67 VR experts from academia and industry. Based on the outcomes, we conducted two user studies in which we tested different presentation and interaction methods of inVRQs and evaluated the usability and practicality of our design. We observed comparable completion times between inVRQs and questionnaires outside VR (nonVRQs) with higher enjoyment but lower usability for . These findings advocate the application of inVRQs and provide an overview of methods and considerations that lay the groundwork for inVRQ design.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext bcc1b129-dfa4-4115-9dd1-70db19717c3d

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on1

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines