Comparing Different Grasping Visualizations for Object Manipulation in VR using Controllers
Giorgos Ganias, Christos Lougiakis, Akrivi Katifori, Maria Roussou, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Ioannis Panagiotis Ioannidis
Abstract
Fig. 1: All grasping visualizations for the different object shapes (Cube, Pyramid, Cylinder). From left to right: (a) Auto-Pose, (b) Single-Pose, (c) Disappearing-Hand Abstract-Virtual grasping is one of the most common and important interactions performed in a Virtual Environment (VE). Even though there has been substantial research using hand tracking methods exploring different ways of visualizing grasping, there are only a few studies that focus on handheld controllers. This gap in research is particularly crucial, since controllers remain the most used input modality in commercial Virtual Reality (VR).
Extending existing research, we designed an experiment comparing three different grasping visualizations when users are interacting with virtual objects in immersive VR using controllers. We examine the following visualizations: the Auto-Pose (AP), where the hand is automatically adjusted to the object upon grasping; the Simple-Pose (SP), where the hand closes fully when selecting the object; and the Disappearing-Hand (DH), where the hand becomes invisible after selecting an object, and turns visible again after positioning it on the target. We recruited 38 participants in order to measure if and how their performance, sense of embodiment, and preference are affected. Our results show that while in terms of performance there is almost no significant difference in any of the visualizations, the perceived sense of embodiment is stronger with the AP, and is generally preferred by the users. Thus, this study incentivizes the inclusion of similar visualizations in relevant future research and VR experiences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aa866f7c-2502-40d4-b5ea-a4668854c439Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- How to Evaluate Object Selection and Manipulation in VR? Guidelines from 20 Years of StudiesJoanna Bergström, Tor-Salve Dalsgaard, Jason Alexander, Kasper HornbækCHI 2021 · 116 citations
- Examining Design Choices of Questionnaires in VR User StudiesDmitry Alexandrovsky, Susanne Putze, Michael Bonfert, Sebastian Höffner et al.CHI 2020 · 80 citations
- Towards "Avatar-Friendly" 3D Manipulation Techniques: Bridging the Gap Between Sense of Embodiment and Interaction in Virtual RealityDiane Dewez, Ludovic Hoyet, Anatole Lécuyer, Ferran Argelaguet-SanzCHI 2021 · 57 citations
- Effects of Virtual Hand Representation on Interaction and Embodiment in HMD-based Virtual Environments Using ControllersChristos Lougiakis, Akrivi Katifori, Maria Roussou, Ioannis Panagiotis IoannidisIEEE VR 2020 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Stretch your reach: Studying Self-Avatar and Controller Misalignment in Virtual Reality InteractionJose Luis Ponton, Reza Keshavarz, Alejandro Beacco, Nuria PelechanoCHI 2024 · 5 citations
- Effect of Hand and Object Visibility in Navigational Tasks Based on Rotational and Translational Movements in Virtual RealityAmal Hatira, Zeynep Ecem Gelmez, Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Mine SaracIEEE VR 2024 · 9 citations
- How Virtual Hand Representations Affect the Perceptions of Dynamic Affordances in Virtual RealityRoshan Venkatakrishnan, Rohith Venkatakrishnan, Balagopal Raveendranath, Christopher C. Pagano et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 33 citations
- Hand Interfaces: Using Hands to Imitate Objects in AR/VR for Expressive InteractionsSiyou Pei, Alexander Chen, Jaewook Lee, Yang ZhangCHI 2022 · 93 citations
- Comparing and Combining Virtual Hand and Virtual Ray Pointer Interactions for Data Manipulation in Immersive AnalyticsJorge A. Wagner Filho, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Luciana P. NedelIEEE VR 2021 · 52 citations
