Tree Evaluation Is in Space O(log n · log log n)
James Cook, Ian Mertz
Abstract
The Tree Evaluation Problem (TreeEval) (Cook et al. 2009) is a central candidate for separating polynomial time (P) from logarithmic space (L) via composition. While space lower bounds of Ω(log 2 ) are known for multiple restricted models, it was recently shown by Cook and Mertz (2020) that TreeEval can be solved in space (log 2 /log log ). Thus its status as a candidate hard problem for L remains a mystery.
Our main result is to improve the space complexity of TreeEval to (log • log log ), thus greatly strengthening the case that Tree Evaluation is in fact in L.
We show two consequences of these results. First, we show that the KRW conjecture (Karchmer, Raz, and Wigderson 1995) implies L ⊈ NC 1 ; this itself would have many implications, such as branching programs not being efficiently simulable by formulas. Our second consequence is to increase our understanding of amortized branching programs, also known as catalytic branching programs; we show that every function on bits can be computed by such a program of length poly( ) and width 2 ( ) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bb5bb3f9-6532-407c-a231-4b8d96e0ecb4Cited by top-tier papers4
- Collapsing Catalytic ClassesMichal Koucký, Ian Mertz, Edward Pyne, Sasha SamiFOCS 2025 · 15 citations
- Bipartite Matching is in Catalytic LogspaceAryan Agarwala, Ian MertzFOCS 2025 · 15 citations
- Simulating Time with Square-Root SpaceR. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- The Structure of Catalytic Space: Capturing Randomness and Time via CompressionJames Cook, Jiatu Li, Ian Mertz, Edward PyneSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on3
- Catalytic approaches to the tree evaluation problemJames Cook, Ian MertzSTOC 2020 · 29 citations
- KRW Composition Theorems via LiftingSusanna F. de Rezende, Or Meir, Jakob Nordström, Toniann Pitassi et al.FOCS 2020 · 6 citations
- Amortized Circuit Complexity, Formal Complexity Measures, and Catalytic AlgorithmsRobert Robere, Jeroen ZuiddamFOCS 2021 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Opening Up the Distinguisher: A Hardness to Randomness Approach for BPL=L That Uses Properties of BPLDean Doron, Edward Pyne, Roei TellSTOC 2024 · 5 citations
- Toward Better Depth Lower Bounds: A KRW-like theorem for Strong CompositionOr MeirFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Certified Hardness vs. Randomness for Log-SpaceEdward Pyne, Ran Raz, Wei ZhanFOCS 2023 · 5 citations
- Computations with greater quantum depth are strictly more powerful (relative to an oracle)Matthew Coudron, Sanketh MendaSTOC 2020 · 25 citations
- Tight Space Complexity of the Coin ProblemMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Or ZamirFOCS 2021 · 5 citations
