Opening Up the Distinguisher: A Hardness to Randomness Approach for BPL=L That Uses Properties of BPL
Dean Doron, Edward Pyne, Roei Tell
Abstract
We provide compelling evidence for the potential of hardness-vs.-randomness approaches to make progress on the long-standing problem of derandomizing spacebounded computation.
Our first contribution is a derandomization of bounded-space machines from hardness assumptions for classes of uniform deterministic algorithms, for which strong (but non-matching) lower bounds can be unconditionally proved. We prove one such result for showing that BPL = L "on average", and another similar result for showing that BPSPACE[O(n)] = DSPACE[O(n)].
Next, we significantly improve the main results of prior works on hardness-vs.randomness for logspace. As one of our results, we relax the assumptions needed for derandomization with minimal memory footprint (i.e., showing BPSPACE[S] ⊆ DSPACE[c • S] for a small constant c), by completely eliminating a cryptographic assumption that was needed in prior work.
A key contribution underlying all of our results is non-black-box use of the descriptions of space-bounded Turing machines, when proving hardness-to-randomness results. That is, the crucial point allowing us to prove our results is that we use properties that are specific to space-bounded machines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1f492ff4-b085-4f26-85ce-b07353240f4aCited by top-tier papers6
- Collapsing Catalytic ClassesMichal Koucký, Ian Mertz, Edward Pyne, Sasha SamiFOCS 2025 · 15 citations
- Bipartite Matching is in Catalytic LogspaceAryan Agarwala, Ian MertzFOCS 2025 · 15 citations
- When Connectivity Is Hard, Random Walks Are Easy with Non-determinismDean Doron, Edward Pyne, Roei Tell, R. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2025 · 4 citations
- Distinguishing, Predicting, and Certifying: On the Long Reach of Partial Notions of PseudorandomnessJiatu Li, Edward Pyne, Roei TellFOCS 2024 · 3 citations
- The Structure of Catalytic Space: Capturing Randomness and Time via CompressionJames Cook, Jiatu Li, Ian Mertz, Edward PyneSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- High-precision Estimation of Random Walks in Small SpaceAmirMahdi Ahmadinejad, Jonathan A. Kelner, Jack Murtagh, John Peebles et al.FOCS 2020 · 20 citations
- Hardness vs Randomness, Revised: Uniform, Non-Black-Box, and Instance-WiseLijie Chen, Roei TellFOCS 2021 · 18 citations
- Nearly Optimal Pseudorandomness From HardnessDean Doron, Dana Moshkovitz, Justin Oh, David ZuckermanFOCS 2020 · 15 citations
- When Arthur Has Neither Random Coins Nor Time to Spare: Superfast Derandomization of Proof SystemsLijie Chen, Roei TellSTOC 2023 · 10 citations
- Polynomial-Time Pseudodeterministic Construction of PrimesLijie Chen, Zhenjian Lu, Igor C. Oliveira, Hanlin Ren et al.FOCS 2023 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Certified Hardness vs. Randomness for Log-SpaceEdward Pyne, Ran Raz, Wei ZhanFOCS 2023 · 5 citations
- Unstructured Hardness to Average-Case RandomnessLijie Chen, Ron D. Rothblum, Roei TellFOCS 2022 · 8 citations
- Fiat-Shamir in the Plain Model from Derandomization (Or: Do Efficient Algorithms Believe that NP = PSPACE?)Lijie Chen, Ron D. Rothblum, Roei TellSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Simple and fast derandomization from very hard functions: eliminating randomness at almost no costLijie Chen, Roei TellSTOC 2021 · 3 citations
- Tree Evaluation Is in Space O(log n · log log n)James Cook, Ian MertzSTOC 2024 · 9 citations
