Catalytic approaches to the tree evaluation problem
James Cook, Ian Mertz
Abstract
The study of branching programs for the Tree Evaluation Problem (TreeEval), introduced by S. Cook et al. (TOCT 2012), remains one of the most promising approaches to separating L from P. Given a label in [๐] at each leaf of a complete binary tree and an explicit function in [๐] 2 โ [๐] for recursively computing the value of each internal node from its children, the problem is to compute the value at the root node. (While the original problem allows an arbitrary-degree tree, we focus on binary trees.) The problem is parameterized by the alphabet size ๐ and the height โ of the tree.
A branching program implementing the straightforward recursive algorithm uses ฮ((๐ + 1) โ ) states, organized into 2 โ -1 layers of width up to ๐ โ . Until now no better deterministic algorithm was known.
We present a series of three new algorithms solving TreeEval. They are inspired by the work of Buhrman et al. on catalytic space (STOC 2012), applied outside the catalytic-space setting. First we give a novel branching program with 2 4โ poly(๐) layers of width 2 3๐ , which beats the straightforward algorithm when โ = ๐ (๐/log ๐). Next we give a branching program with ๐ 2โ poly(๐) layers of width ๐ 3 . This has total size comparable to the straightforward algorithm, but is implemented using the catalytic framework. Finally we interpolate between the two algorithms to give a branching program with (๐ ( ๐ โ )) 2โ poly(๐) layers of width (๐ ( ๐ โ )) ๐โ for any constant ๐ > 0, which beats the straightforward algorithm for all โ โฅ ๐ 1/2+poly ๐ . These are the first deterministic branching programs to beat the straightforward algorithm, but more importantly this is the first non-trivial approach to proving deterministic upper bounds for TreeEval.
We also contribute new machinery to the catalytic computing program, which may be of independent interest to some readers.
โข Theory of computation โ Computational complexity and cryptography; Design and analysis of algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 49a989e1-fb05-477c-a20c-7d9b693ef213Cited by top-tier papers7
- Bipartite Matching is in Catalytic LogspaceAryan Agarwala, Ian MertzFOCS 2025 ยท 15 citations
- Tree Evaluation Is in Space O(log n ยท log log n)James Cook, Ian MertzSTOC 2024 ยท 9 citations
- Amortized Circuit Complexity, Formal Complexity Measures, and Catalytic AlgorithmsRobert Robere, Jeroen ZuiddamFOCS 2021 ยท 6 citations
- Distinguishing, Predicting, and Certifying: On the Long Reach of Partial Notions of PseudorandomnessJiatu Li, Edward Pyne, Roei TellFOCS 2024 ยท 3 citations
- Boosting Uniformity in Quasirandom Groups: Fast and SimpleHarm Derksen, Chin Ho Lee, Emanuele ViolaFOCS 2024 ยท 2 citations
Related papers
- Simulating Time with Square-Root SpaceR. Ryan WilliamsSTOC 2025 ยท 1 citation
- Breaking the Cubic Barrier for (Unweighted) Tree Edit DistanceXiao MaoFOCS 2021 ยท 7 citations
- Tight Space Complexity of the Coin ProblemMark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Or ZamirFOCS 2021 ยท 5 citations
- Team Correlated Equilibria in Zero-Sum Extensive-Form Games via Tree DecompositionsBrian Hu Zhang, Tuomas SandholmAAAI 2022 ยท 26 citations
- Near-Optimal Derandomization of Medium-Width Branching ProgramsAaron (Louie) Putterman, Edward PyneSTOC 2023 ยท 3 citations
