Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 Surprisal
Byung-Doh Oh, William Schuler
Abstract
Transformer-based large language models are trained to make predictions about the next word by aggregating representations of previous tokens through their self-attention mechanism. In the field of cognitive modeling, such attention patterns have recently been interpreted as embodying the process of cuebased retrieval, in which attention over multiple targets is taken to generate interference and latency during retrieval. Under this framework, this work first defines an entropy-based predictor that quantifies the diffuseness of selfattention, as well as distance-based predictors that capture the incremental change in attention patterns across timesteps. Moreover, following recent studies that question the informativeness of attention weights, we also experiment with alternative methods for incorporating vector norms into attention weights. Regression experiments using predictors calculated from the GPT-2 language model show that these predictors deliver a substantially better fit to held-out self-paced reading and eye-tracking data over a rigorous baseline including GPT-2 surprisal. Additionally, the distance-based predictors generally demonstrated higher predictive power, with effect sizes of up to 6.59 ms per standard deviation on self-paced reading times (compared to 2.82 ms for surprisal) and 1.05 ms per standard deviation on eye-gaze durations (compared to 3.81 ms for surprisal).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext baf3d794-98e1-4da3-93e0-742aa5ff81a9Cited by top-tier papers5
- Training-free Diffusion Model Adaptation for Variable-Sized Text-to-Image SynthesisZhiyu Jin, Xuli Shen, Bin Li, Xiangyang XueNeurIPS 2023 · 72 citations
- Analyzing Feed-Forward Blocks in Transformers through the Lens of Attention MapsGoro Kobayashi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Sho Yokoi, Kentaro InuiICLR 2024 · 35 citations
- If Attention Serves as a Cognitive Model of Human Memory Retrieval, What is the Plausible Memory Representation?Ryo Yoshida, Shinnosuke Isono, Kohei Kajikawa, Taiga Someya et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Modeling Nonnative Sentence Processing with L2 Language ModelsTatsuya Aoyama, Nathan SchneiderEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Memory efficiency and resource-rational encoding in sentence processingWeijie Xu, Brian Dillon, Richard FutrellACL 2026
Builds on3
- Attention is Not Only a Weight: Analyzing Transformers with Vector NormsGoro Kobayashi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Sho Yokoi, Kentaro InuiEMNLP 2020 · 138 citations
- Incorporating Residual and Normalization Layers into Analysis of Masked Language ModelsGoro Kobayashi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Sho Yokoi, Kentaro InuiEMNLP 2021 · 28 citations
- Surprisal Estimators for Human Reading Times Need Character ModelsByung-Doh Oh, Christian Clark, William SchulerACL 2021
Related papers
- Measuring the Impact of (Psycho-)Linguistic and Readability Features and Their Spill Over Effects on the Prediction of Eye Movement PatternsDaniel Wiechmann, Elma KerzACL 2022 · 17 citations
- Do Transformer Models Show Similar Attention Patterns to Task-Specific Human Gaze?Oliver Eberle, Stephanie Brandl, Jonas Pilot, Anders SøgaardACL 2022
- Probing for Reading TimesEleftheria Tsipidi, Samuel Kiegeland, Francesco Ignazio Re, Tianyang Xu et al.ACL 2026
- Towards A Scanpath-Conditioned Surprisal Theory: Modeling Reader Information StatesMichael Mooney, Edmond S. L. HoACL 2026
- Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times - but does it do so for the "right reasons"?Tong Liu, Iza Skrjanec, Vera DembergACL 2024 · 3 citations
