If Attention Serves as a Cognitive Model of Human Memory Retrieval, What is the Plausible Memory Representation?
Ryo Yoshida, Shinnosuke Isono, Kohei Kajikawa, Taiga Someya, Yushi Sugimoto, Yohei Oseki
Abstract
Recent work in computational psycholinguistics has revealed intriguing parallels between attention mechanisms and human memory retrieval, focusing primarily on vanilla Transformers that operate on token-level representations. However, computational psycholinguistic research has also established that syntactic structures provide compelling explanations for human sentence processing that token-level factors cannot fully account for. In this paper, we investigate whether the attention mechanism of Transformer Grammar (TG), which uniquely operates on syntactic structures as representational units, can serve as a cognitive model of human memory retrieval, using Normalized Attention Entropy (NAE) as a linking hypothesis between models and humans. Our experiments demonstrate that TG's attention achieves superior predictive power for self-paced reading times compared to vanilla Transformer's, with further analyses revealing independent contributions from both models. These findings suggest that human sentence processing involves dual memory representations -- one based on syntactic structures and another on token sequences -- with attention serving as the general memory retrieval algorithm, while highlighting the importance of incorporating syntactic structures as representational units.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 31cd03a4-ef78-4969-b1cc-0e17bce61846Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Attention is Not Only a Weight: Analyzing Transformers with Vector NormsGoro Kobayashi, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Sho Yokoi, Kentaro InuiEMNLP 2020 · 138 citations
- A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language ModelsJennifer Hu, Jon Gauthier, Peng Qian, Ethan Wilcox et al.ACL 2020 · 124 citations
- Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 SurprisalByung-Doh Oh, William SchulerEMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- On the Proper Treatment of Tokenization in PsycholinguisticsMario Giulianelli, Luca Malagutti, Juan Luis Gastaldi, Brian DuSell et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Memory efficiency and resource-rational encoding in sentence processingWeijie Xu, Brian Dillon, Richard FutrellACL 2026
- Do Transformer Models Show Similar Attention Patterns to Task-Specific Human Gaze?Oliver Eberle, Stephanie Brandl, Jonas Pilot, Anders SøgaardACL 2022
- SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading ComprehensionZhuosheng Zhang, Yuwei Wu, Junru Zhou, Sufeng Duan et al.AAAI 2020 · 192 citations
- TSAcc: An Efficient Tempo-Spatial Similarity Aware Accelerator for Attention AccelerationZhuoran Song, Chunyu Qi, Yuanzheng Yao, Peng Zhou et al.DAC 2024 · 9 citations
- Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence ProcessingTatsuki Kuribayashi, Alex Warstadt, Yohei Oseki, Ethan Gotlieb WilcoxACL 2026 · 1 citation
