Measuring the Impact of (Psycho-)Linguistic and Readability Features and Their Spill Over Effects on the Prediction of Eye Movement Patterns
Daniel Wiechmann, Elma Kerz
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the combined use of NLP and machine learning methods to predict gaze patterns during naturalistic reading. While promising results have been obtained through the use of transformer-based language models, little work has been undertaken to relate the performance of such models to general text characteristics. In this paper we report on experiments with two eye-tracking corpora of naturalistic reading and two language models (BERT and GPT-2). In all experiments, we test effects of a broad spectrum of features for predicting human reading behavior that fall into five categories (syntactic complexity, lexical richness, register-based multiword combinations, readability and psycholinguistic word properties). Our experiments show that both the features included and the architecture of the transformer-based language models play a role in predicting multiple eye-tracking measures during naturalistic reading. We also report the results of experiments aimed at determining the relative importance of features from different groups using SP-LIME.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 94c98f28-e27c-4b5b-9a07-9977108e0b70Related papers
- Entropy- and Distance-Based Predictors From GPT-2 Attention Patterns Predict Reading Times Over and Above GPT-2 SurprisalByung-Doh Oh, William SchulerEMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- Probing for Reading TimesEleftheria Tsipidi, Samuel Kiegeland, Francesco Ignazio Re, Tianyang Xu et al.ACL 2026
- From Human Reading to NLM Understanding: Evaluating the Role of Eye-Tracking Data in Encoder-Based ModelsLuca Dini, Lucia Domenichelli, Dominique Brunato, Felice Dell'OrlettaACL 2025
- Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training HelpsAlexandre Pasquiou, Yair Lakretz, John T. Hale, Bertrand Thirion et al.ICML 2022 · 44 citations
- Do Transformer Models Show Similar Attention Patterns to Task-Specific Human Gaze?Oliver Eberle, Stephanie Brandl, Jonas Pilot, Anders SøgaardACL 2022
