Model-based Preference Optimization in Abstractive Summarization without Human Feedback
Jaepill Choi, Kyubyung Chae, Jiwoo Song, Yohan Jo, Taesup Kim
Abstract
In abstractive summarization, the challenge of producing concise and accurate summaries arises from the vast amount of information contained in the source document. Consequently, although Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, they often introduce inaccuracies by hallucinating content not found in the original source. While supervised finetuning methods that maximize likelihood contribute to this issue, they do not consistently enhance the faithfulness of the summaries. Preference-based optimization methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), can further refine the model to align with human preferences. However, these methods still heavily depend on costly human feedback. In this work, we introduce a novel and straightforward approach called Model-based Preference Optimization (MPO) to fine-tune LLMs for improved summarization abilities without any human feedback. By leveraging the model's inherent summarization capabilities, we create a preference dataset that is fully generated by the model using different decoding strategies. Our experiments on standard summarization datasets and various metrics demonstrate that our proposed MPO significantly enhances the quality of generated summaries without relying on human feedback. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/cjaep/MPO .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bad09081-1618-40ed-9acd-e190ec175a7fBuilds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
Related papers
- Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language ModelsHung Le, Quan Hung Tran, Dung Nguyen, Kien Do et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- SCOPE: A Self-supervised Framework for Improving Faithfulness in Conditional Text GenerationSong Duong, Florian Le Bronnec, Alexandre Allauzen, Vincent Guigue et al.ICLR 2025
- Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model over Aligned Large Language ModelsYuchen Fan, Yuzhong Hong, Qiushi Wang, Junwei Bao et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Refining Text Generation for Realistic Conversational Recommendation via Direct Preference OptimizationManato Tajiri, Michimasa InabaEMNLP 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
