Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model over Aligned Large Language Models
Yuchen Fan, Yuzhong Hong, Qiushi Wang, Junwei Bao, Hongfei Jiang, Yang Song
Abstract
Alignment, endowing a pre-trained Large language model (LLM) with the ability to follow instructions, is crucial for its real-world applications. Conventional supervised fine-tuning (SFT) methods formalize it as causal language modeling typically with a cross-entropy objective, requiring a large amount of high-quality instruction-response pairs. However, the quality of widely used SFT datasets can not be guaranteed due to the high cost and intensive labor for the creation and maintenance in practice. To overcome the limitations associated with the quality of SFT datasets, we introduce a novel preference-oriented supervised fine-tuning approach, namely PoFT. The intuition is to boost SFT by imposing a particular preference: favoring the target model over aligned LLMs on the same SFT data. This preference encourages the target model to predict a higher likelihood than that predicted by the aligned LLMs, incorporating assessment information on data quality (i.e., predicted likelihood by the aligned LLMs) into the training process. Extensive experiments are conducted, and the results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. PoFT achieves stable and consistent improvements over the SFT baselines across different training datasets and base models. Moreover, we prove that PoFT can be integrated with existing SFT data filtering methods to achieve better performance, and further improved by following preference optimization procedures, such as DPO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19df0b65-8358-4091-970e-eb91240779c2Cited by top-tier papers2
- GVPO: Group Variance Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Post-TrainingKaichen Zhang, Yuzhong Hong, Junwei Bao, Hongfei Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 35 citations
- LLM-CAS: Dynamic Neuron Perturbation for Real-Time Hallucination CorrectionJusheng Zhang, Ningyuan Liu, Yijia Fan, Zihao Huang et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on14
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
Related papers
- Discriminative Finetuning of Generative Large Language Models without Reward Models and Human Preference DataSiqi Guo, Ilgee Hong, Vicente Balmaseda, Changlong Yu et al.ICML 2025
- Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for AlignmentGeyang Guo, Ranchi Zhao, Tianyi Tang, Xin Zhao et al.ICLR 2024 · 44 citations
- Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO ConnectionsBo Wang, Qinyuan Cheng, Runyu Peng, Rong Bao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Intuitive Fine-Tuning: Towards Simplifying Alignment into a Single ProcessErmo Hua, Biqing Qi, Kaiyan Zhang, Kai Tian et al.ACL 2025
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
