Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connections
Bo Wang, Qinyuan Cheng, Runyu Peng, Rong Bao, Peiji Li, Qipeng Guo, Linyang Li, Zhiyuan Zeng, Yunhua Zhou, Xipeng Qiu
Abstract
Post-training processes are essential phases in grounding pre-trained language models to real-world tasks, with learning from demonstrations or preference signals playing a crucial role in this adaptation. We present a unified theoretical framework bridging Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and preference learning in Large Language Model (LLM) post-training. Through rigorous mathematical derivation, we demonstrate that both SFT and preference learning methods like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) operate within the same optimal policy-reward subspace, with SFT representing a special case of implicit reward learning. Our analysis reveals a critical limitation in conventional SFT: the KL divergence term in distribution matching becomes constant with respect to the policy during optimization, failing to constrain model updates. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective learning rate reduction approach that yields significant performance improvements (up to 25% relative gain and 6% absolute win rate increase in instruction following tasks. Additionally, we derive alternative SFT objectives from various f-divergence functions that preserve the KL term during optimization, further enhancing post-DPO model performance. Finally, we extend the theoretical relationship between LLM logits and Q-functions from preference learning to the SFT context, providing mathematical derivations and experimental validation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 396edd0b-8ac0-43e5-83c3-a45ce7ec7caaCited by top-tier papers3
- Beyond Log Likelihood: Probability-Based Objectives for Supervised Fine-Tuning across the Model Capability ContinuumGaotang Li, Ruizhong Qiu, Xiusi Chen, Heng Ji et al.ICML 2026 · 15 citations
- Compatibility-Aware Dynamic Fine-Tuning for Large Language ModelsYucheng Zhou, Junwei Sheng, Qianning Wang, Jianbing ShenACL 2026
- IRIS: Implicit Reward-Guided Internal Sifting for Mitigating Multimodal HallucinationYuanshuai Li, Yuping Yan, Jirui Han, Fei Ming et al.ICML 2026
Builds on17
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial RegularizerZhihan Liu, Miao Lu, Shenao Zhang, Boyi Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model over Aligned Large Language ModelsYuchen Fan, Yuzhong Hong, Qiushi Wang, Junwei Bao et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Intuitive Fine-Tuning: Towards Simplifying Alignment into a Single ProcessErmo Hua, Biqing Qi, Kaiyan Zhang, Kai Tian et al.ACL 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- Token-level Direct Preference OptimizationYongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 136 citations
