When Instinct Guides and Insight Grounds: Staged RL Training for LLM Agents
Zijing Zhang, Boning Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong potential in complex, interactive decision-making tasks. However, when training LLM agents end-to-end with reinforcement learning (RL), efficiently optimizing agent policies in dynamic environments remains a significant challenge. Existing RL-based LLM agent paradigms commonly organize interactions in a cycle where reasoning is followed by action. In our work, we observe a phenomenon we call Exploration Contraction, where the explicit introduction of a reasoning stage reduces the diversity of actions—quantified by lower action entropy—which in turn limits exploration and leads to premature policy convergence. To address this limitation, we propose Act-before-Reasoning (ActRe), a two-stage RL training framework. In the first stage, we reverse the typical rollout order, prompting the agent to generate actions prior to reasoning, which encourages exploration driven by model intuition. In the second stage, we restore the standard reasoning-then-action order for training and evaluation, ensuring robust and interpretable decision-making. Experiments on the ALFWorld and WebShop benchmarks show that ActRe effectively mitigates exploration contraction, yielding consistently higher task success rates and improved training robustness compared to strong RL baselines. Our analysis underscores the importance of action entropy in the exploration-exploitation trade-off during LLM agent training and provides a practical approach to maintain the benefits of explicit reasoning while promoting sufficient exploration.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on19
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language AgentsShunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, Karthik NarasimhanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,477 citations
- ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,469 citations
Related papers
- MetaAct-RL: Training Language Models for Reasoning Through Meta-Action-Based Reinforcement LearningZhiheng Xi, Yuhui Wang, Yiwen Ding, Guanyu Li et al.AAAI 2026
- ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du et al.ICLR 2023
- GTR: Guided Thought Reinforcement Prevents Thought Collapse in RL-Based VLM Agent TrainingTong Wei, Yijun Yang, Junliang Xing, Yuanchun Shi et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- Trust-Region Adaptive Policy OptimizationMingyu Su, Jian Guan, Yuxian Gu, Minlie Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- DPEPO: Diverse Parallel Exploration Policy Optimization for LLM-based AgentsJunShuo Zhang, Chengrui Huang, Feng Guo, Zihan Li et al.ACL 2026
