Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization
Mingyu Su, Jian Guan, Yuxian Gu, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang
Abstract
Post-training methods, especially Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), play an important role in improving large language models' (LLMs) complex reasoning abilities. However, the dominant two-stage pipeline (SFT then RL) suffers from a key inconsistency: SFT enforces rigid imitation that suppresses exploration and induces forgetting, limiting RL's potential for improvements. We address this inefficiency with TRAPO (Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization), a hybrid framework that interleaves SFT and RL within each training instance by optimizing SFT loss on expert prefixes and RL loss on the model's own completions, unifying external supervision and self-exploration. To stabilize training, we introduce Trust-Region SFT (TrSFT), which minimizes forward KL divergence inside a trust region but attenuates optimization outside, effectively shifting toward reverse KL and yielding stable, mode-seeking updates favorable for RL. An adaptive prefix-selection mechanism further allocates expert guidance based on measured utility. Experiments on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that TRAPO consistently surpasses standard SFT, RL, and SFT-then-RL pipelines, as well as recent state-of-the-art approaches, establishing a strong new paradigm for reasoning-enhanced LLMs. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Su-my/TRAPO .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7bede14f-4c38-477f-aaa7-2c1608365cf1Cited by top-tier papers3
- Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and FailuresYi Hu, Jiaqi Gu, Ruxin Wang, Zijun Yao et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Retro-Expert: Collaborative Reasoning for Interpretable RetrosynthesisXinyi Li, Sai Wang, Yutian Lin, Yu WuICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Navigating the Pareto Frontier of Alignment: Spectrum-Adaptive Fine-Tuning for LLMsYaoyou Fan, Chao Zhang, Xiaoyu Tan, Chenxing Sun et al.ICML 2026
Builds on14
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive LearningMohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk et al.ICLR 2021 · 819 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
Related papers
- Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoningzhaoyang zhang, Shuli Jiang, Yantao Shen, Yuting Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement LearningZhenrui Yue, Bowen Jin, Huimin Zeng, Honglei Zhuang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM ReasoningLiang Chen, Xueting Han, Li Shen, Jing Bai et al.ICML 2026 · 24 citations
- Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix SamplingZeyu Huang, Tianhao Cheng, Zihan Qiu, Zili Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 47 citations
- From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model ReasoningLingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
