MetaAct-RL: Training Language Models for Reasoning Through Meta-Action-Based Reinforcement Learning
Zhiheng Xi, Yuhui Wang, Yiwen Ding, Guanyu Li, Senjie Jin, Shichun Liu, Jixuan Huang, Dingwen Yang, Jiafu Tang, Boyang Hong, Junjie Ye, Shihan Dou
Abstract
Outcome-based reinforcement learning has made notable advances in training language models (LMs) for reasoning. However, without explicit incentives and controls, this paradigm has limitations and instability in eliciting high-quality reasoning trajectories with diverse actions-particularly for models whose pretraining lacked extensive reasoning-related data. To this end, we introduce MetaAct-RL, a new RL framework that frames LMs' thinking as sequential decision making over meta-actions. In this framework, the model chooses and executes a high-level action at each step-such as forward reasoning, critique, or refinement-to gradually reach the correct answer. To encourage deeper exploration, richer action diversity, and to improve sampling efficiency in the RL optimization process, MetaAct-RL incorporates appropriate lengthbased reward and regularization, and a key-state restart mechanism. Extensive experiments across six benchmarks show that MetaAct-RL improves reasoning performance by 7.99 on Llama3.2-1B and 7.17 on Llama3.1-8B relative to vanilla RL method. Moreover, on the challenging AIME-2024, our method outperforms the vanilla RL by 7.5 with Qwen2.5-1.5B.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3c37bbb4-a9bd-46a5-8133-37c6f9cf4d4eBuilds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
Related papers
- ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement LearningMingyang Chen, Linzhuang Sun, Tianpeng Li, Haoze Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 125 citations
- EAPO: Enhancing Policy Optimization with On-Demand Expert AssistanceSiyao Song, Cong Ma, Zhihao Cheng, Shiye Lei et al.ICML 2026
- GLoRe: When, Where, and How to Improve LLM Reasoning via Global and Local RefinementsAlexander Havrilla, Sharath Chandra Raparthy, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Jane Dwivedi-Yu et al.ICML 2024 · 105 citations
- Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement LearningSimon Zhai, Hao Bai, Zipeng Lin, Jiayi Pan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 214 citations
- ReMA: Learning to Meta-Think for LLMs with Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningZiyu Wan, Yunxiang Li, Xiaoyu Wen, Yan Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 76 citations
