Time Blindness: Why Video-Language Models Can't See What Humans Can?
Ujjwal Upadhyay, Mukul Ranjan, Zhiqiang Shen, Mohamed Elhoseiny
Abstract
Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have made impressive strides in understanding spatio-temporal relationships in videos. However, when spatial information is obscured, these models struggle to capture purely temporal patterns. We introduce , a benchmark where information is encoded solely in temporal sequences of noise-like frames, mirroring natural phenomena from biological signaling to covert communication. Interestingly, while humans can recognize shapes, text, and patterns in these sequences with over 98% accuracy, state-of-the-art VLMs achieve 0% accuracy. This performance gap highlights a critical limitation: an over-reliance on frame-level spatial features and an inability to extract meaning from temporal cues. Furthermore, when trained in data sets with low spatial signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), temporal understanding of models degrades more rapidly than human perception, especially in tasks requiring fine-grained temporal reasoning. Overcoming this limitation will require novel architectures or training paradigms that decouple spatial dependencies from temporal processing. Our systematic analysis shows that this issue persists across model scales and architectures. We release SpookyBench to catalyze research in temporal pattern recognition and bridge the gap between human and machine video understanding. Dataset and code has been made available on our project website: https://timeblindness.github.io/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8c382f8-3eb5-48cb-bbed-292190319716Cited by top-tier papers2
- Next-Gen CAPTCHAs: Leveraging the Cognitive Gap for Scalable and Diverse GUI-Agent DefenseJiacheng Liu, Yaxin Luo, Jiacheng Cui, Xinyi Shang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- From Perception to Planning: Evolving Ego-Centric Task-Oriented Spatiotemporal Reasoning via Curriculum LearningXiaoda Yang, Yuxiang Liu, Shenzhou Gao, Can Wang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on32
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?Gedas Bertasius, Heng Wang, Lorenzo TorresaniICML 2021 · 2,927 citations
Related papers
- V2P-Bench: Evaluating Video-Language Understanding with Visual Prompts for Better Human-Model InteractionYiming Zhao, Yu Zeng, Yukun Qi, YaoYang Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- SpatialLogic-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Task-Oriented Spatiotemporal ReasoningXiaoda Yang, Shenzhou Gao, Can Wang, Jiahe Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language ModelsShijie Zhou, Alexander Vilesov, Xuehai He, Ziyu Wan et al.ICCV 2025 · 9 citations
- MotionBench: Benchmarking and Improving Fine-grained Video Motion Understanding for Vision Language ModelsWenyi Hong, Yean Cheng, Zhuoyi Yang, Weihan Wang et al.CVPR 2025
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
