From Perception to Planning: Evolving Ego-Centric Task-Oriented Spatiotemporal Reasoning via Curriculum Learning
Xiaoda Yang, Yuxiang Liu, Shenzhou Gao, Can Wang, Jingyang Xue, Lixin Yang, Yao Mu, Tao Jin, Zhimeng Zhang, Shuicheng YAN, Zhou Zhao
Abstract
Modern vision-language models achieve strong performance in static perception, but remain limited in the complex spatiotemporal reasoning required for embodied, egocentric tasks. A major source of failure is their reliance on temporal priors learned from passive video data, which often leads to spatiotemporal hallucinations and poor generalization in dynamic environments. To address this, we present EgoTSR, a curriculum-based framework for learning task-oriented spatiotemporal reasoning. EgoTSR is built on the premise that embodied reasoning should evolve from explicit spatial understanding to internalized task-state assessment and finally to long-horizon planning. To support this paradigm, we construct EgoTSR-Data, a large-scale dataset comprising 46 million samples organized into three stages: Chain-of-Thought supervision for explicit reasoning, weakly supervised tagging for internalizing reasoning, and long-horizon sequences composed of orthogonal atomic subtasks. We further introduce a Reasoning-Enhanced Task Decomposition mechanism that explicitly models causal dependencies between actions and objects, enabling controllable planning from high-level task descriptions. To rigorously validate our approach, we establish a Dual-Level Evaluation Framework that covers both atomic spatial perception and logical planning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EgoTSR effectively eliminates chronological biases, achieving 92.4% accuracy on long-horizon logical reasoning tasks while maintaining 88.2% fine-grained perceptual precision, significantly outperforming existing open-source and closed-source state-of-the-art models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- 3D-LLM: Injecting the 3D World into Large Language ModelsYining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 662 citations
- Ego4D: Around the World in 3, 000 Hours of Egocentric VideoKristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis et al.CVPR 2022 · 525 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
Related papers
- EgoThinker: Unveiling Egocentric Reasoning with Spatio-Temporal CoTBaoqi Pei, Yifei Huang, Jilan Xu, Yuping He et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- CLiViS: Unleashing Cognitive Map through Linguistic-Visual Synergy for Embodied Visual ReasoningKailing Li, Qi'ao Xu, Tianwen Qian, Yuqian Fu et al.CVPR 2026 · 12 citations
- SCoT: Teaching 3D-LLMs to Think Spatially with Million-scale CoT AnnotationsJinpeng Li, Haiping Wang, Jiabin Chen, Yuan Liu et al.ICLR 2026
- Look, Remember and Reason: Grounded Reasoning in Videos with Language ModelsApratim Bhattacharyya, Sunny Panchal, Reza Pourreza, Mingu Lee et al.ICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- A Very Big Video Reasoning SuiteMaijunxian Wang, Ruisi Wang, Juyi Lin, Ran Ji et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
