DAFA: Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial Training
Hyungyu Lee, Saehyung Lee, Hyemi Jang, Junsung Park, Ho Bae, Sungroh Yoon
Abstract
The disparity in accuracy between classes in standard training is amplified during adversarial training, a phenomenon termed the robust fairness problem. Existing methodologies aimed to enhance robust fairness by sacrificing the model's performance on easier classes in order to improve its performance on harder ones. However, we observe that under adversarial attacks, the majority of the model's predictions for samples from the worst class are biased towards classes similar to the worst class, rather than towards the easy classes. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we demonstrate that robust fairness deteriorates as the distance between classes decreases. Motivated by these insights, we introduce the Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial training (DAFA) methodology, which addresses robust fairness by taking into account the similarities between classes. Specifically, our method assigns distinct loss weights and adversarial margins to each class and adjusts them to encourage a trade-off in robustness among similar classes. Experimental results across various datasets demonstrate that our method not only maintains average robust accuracy but also significantly improves the worst robust accuracy, indicating a marked improvement in robust fairness compared to existing methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b88134c0-b779-4eeb-8d9c-3d9a772bda01Cited by top-tier papers3
- Taming the Long Tail: Rebalancing Adversarial Training via Adaptive PerturbationLilin Zhang, Yimo Guo, Yue Li, Jiancheng Shi et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Posterior Mismatch Matters: Adversarial Training for Long-Tailed RobustnessLilin Zhang, Li Yue, Jiancheng Shi, Jiancheng Lv et al.ICML 2026
- Long-tailed Adversarial Training with Self-DistillationSeungju Cho, Hongsin Lee, Changick KimICLR 2025
Builds on12
- Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentAditya Krishna Menon, Sadeep Jayasumana, Ankit Singh Rawat, Himanshu Jain et al.ICLR 2021 · 937 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
- Data Augmentation Can Improve RobustnessSylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Sven Gowal, Dan Andrei Calian, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 427 citations
- Improving Robustness using Generated DataSven Gowal, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Olivia Wiles, Florian Stimberg et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 384 citations
- Bag of Tricks for Adversarial TrainingTianyu Pang, Xiao Yang, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su et al.ICLR 2021 · 298 citations
Related papers
- CFA: Class-Wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial TrainingZeming Wei, Yifei Wang, Yiwen Guo, Yisen WangCVPR 2023
- Towards Fairness-Aware Adversarial LearningYanghao Zhang, Tianle Zhang, Ronghui Mu, Xiaowei Huang et al.CVPR 2024 · 6 citations
- On the Tradeoff Between Robustness and FairnessXinsong Ma, Zekai Wang, Weiwei LiuNeurIPS 2022 · 64 citations
- On the Alignment between Fairness and Accuracy: from the Perspective of Adversarial RobustnessJunyi Chai, Taeuk Jang, Jing Gao, Xiaoqian WangICML 2025
- Revisiting Adversarial Robustness Distillation from the Perspective of Robust FairnessXinli Yue, Ningping Mou, Qian Wang, Lingchen ZhaoNeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
