Lune

ICLR2021Top-tier venue

Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Training

Tianyu Pang, Xiao Yang, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su, Jun Zhu

2021Year
298Citations
111Top-tier citations

Abstract

Adversarial training (AT) is one of the most effective strategies for promoting model robustness. However, recent benchmarks show that most of the proposed improvements on AT are less effective than simply early stopping the training procedure. This counter-intuitive fact motivates us to investigate the implementation details of tens of AT methods. Surprisingly, we find that the basic settings (e.g., weight decay, training schedule, etc.) used in these methods are highly inconsistent. In this work, we provide comprehensive evaluations on CIFAR-10, focusing on the effects of mostly overlooked training tricks and hyperparameters for adversarially trained models. Our empirical observations suggest that adversarial robustness is much more sensitive to some basic training settings than we thought. For example, a slightly different value of weight decay can reduce the model robust accuracy by more than 7%, which is probable to override the potential promotion induced by the proposed methods. We conclude a baseline training setting and re-implement previous defenses to achieve new state-of-the-art results 1 . These facts also appeal to more concerns on the overlooked confounders when benchmarking defenses.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 2e49fb17-d312-42b7-874a-eb4ac55e73ea

Cited by top-tier papers111

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on24

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines