On the Pauli Spectrum of QAC0
Shivam Nadimpalli, Natalie Parham, Francisca Vasconcelos, Henry Yuen
Abstract
The circuit class QAC0 was introduced by Moore (1999) as a model for constant depth quantum circuits where the gate set includes many-qubit Toffoli gates. Proving lower bounds against such circuits is a longstanding challenge in quantum circuit complexity; in particular, showing that polynomial-size QAC0 cannot compute the parity function has remained an open question for over 20 years. In this work, we identify a notion of the Pauli spectrum of QAC0 circuits, which can be viewed as the quantum analogue of the Fourier spectrum of classical AC0 circuits. We conjecture that the Pauli spectrum of QAC0 circuits satisfies low-degree concentration, in analogy to the famous Linial, Mansour, Nisan (LMN) theorem on the low-degree Fourier concentration of AC0 circuits. If true, this conjecture immediately implies that polynomial-size QAC0 circuits cannot compute parity. We prove this conjecture for the class of depth-d, polynomial-size QAC0 circuits with at most nO(1/d) auxiliary qubits. We obtain new circuit lower bounds and learning results as applications: this class of circuits cannot correctly compute the n-bit parity function on more than (1/2 + 2−Ω(n1/d))-fraction of inputs, and the n-bit majority function on more than (1/2 + O(n−1/4))-fraction of inputs. Additionally we show that this class of QAC0 circuits with limited auxiliary qubits can be learned with quasipolynomial sample complexity, giving the first learning result for QAC0 circuits. More broadly, our results add evidence that “Pauli-analytic” techniques can be a powerful tool in studying quantum circuits.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b699a1b9-91a0-4b5c-b500-4d31272007bbCited by top-tier papers5
- On the Computational Power of QAC0 with Barely Superlinear AncillaeAnurag Anshu, Yangjing Dong, Fengning Ou, Penghui YaoSTOC 2025 · 19 citations
- Quantum Circuit Lower Bounds in the Magic HierarchyNatalie ParhamSTOC 2026 · 15 citations
- Optimal Tradeoffs for Estimating Pauli ObservablesSitan Chen, Weiyuan Gong, Qi YeFOCS 2024 · 13 citations
- Learning Junta Distributions, Quantum Junta States, and QAC CircuitsJinge Bao, Francisco Escudero GutiérrezICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Improved Lower Bounds for QAC0Malvika Raj Joshi, Avishay Tal, Francisca Vasconcelos, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on4
- Exponential Separations Between Learning With and Without Quantum MemorySitan Chen, Jordan Cotler, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jerry LiFOCS 2021 · 79 citations
- A Polynomial-Time Classical Algorithm for Noisy Random Circuit SamplingDorit Aharonov, Xun Gao, Zeph Landau, Yunchao Liu et al.STOC 2023 · 74 citations
- NLTS Hamiltonians from Good Quantum CodesAnurag Anshu, Nikolas P. Breuckmann, Chinmay NirkheSTOC 2023 · 50 citations
- Testing and Learning Quantum Juntas Nearly OptimallyThomas Chen, Shivam Nadimpalli, Henry YuenSODA 2023 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Quantum learning algorithms imply circuit lower boundsSrinivasan Arunachalam, Alex B. Grilo, Tom Gur, Igor C. Oliveira et al.FOCS 2021 · 6 citations
- Interactive shallow Clifford circuits: quantum advantage against NC¹ and beyondDaniel Grier, Luke SchaefferSTOC 2020
- Learning Quantum States Prepared by Shallow Circuits in Polynomial TimeZeph Landau, Yunchao LiuSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
- Quantum Precomputation: Parallelizing Cascade Circuits and the Moore-Nilsson Conjecture Is FalseAdam Bene Watts, Charles R. Chen, J. William Helton, Joseph SloteSTOC 2026 · 1 citation
- Testing and Learning Structured Quantum HamiltoniansSrinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Francisco Escudero GutiérrezSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
