Quantum Precomputation: Parallelizing Cascade Circuits and the Moore-Nilsson Conjecture Is False
Adam Bene Watts, Charles R. Chen, J. William Helton, Joseph Slote
Abstract
Parallelization is a major challenge in quantum algorithms due to physical constraints like no-cloning. This is vividly illustrated by the conjecture of Moore and Nilsson from their seminal work on quantum circuit complexity [MN01, announced 1998]: unitaries of a deceptively simple form-controlled-unitary "staircases"-require circuits of minimum depth Ω(n). If true, this lower bound would represent a major break from classical parallelism and prove a quantum-native analogue of the famous NC ̸ = P conjecture.
In this work we settle the Moore-Nilsson conjecture in the negative by compressing all circuits in the class to depth O(log n), which is the best possible. The parallelizations are exact, ancilla-free, and can be computed in poly(n) time. We also consider circuits restricted to 2D connectivity, for which we derive compressions of optimal depth O( √ n). More generally, we make progress on the project of quantum parallelization by introducing a quantum blockwise precomputation technique somewhat analogous to the method of Arlazarov, Dinič, Kronrod, and Faradžev [Arl+70] in classical dynamic programming, often called the "Four-Russians method." We apply this technique to moregeneral "cascade" circuits as well, obtaining for example polynomial depth reductions for staircases of controlled log(n)-qubit unitaries.
Warning. Due to limitations of arXiv and the Tik Z externalize package, your PDF viewer may not correctly render transparencies in circuit diagrams below. A patched document is available at joeslote.com/documents/precomputation.pdf.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b5281139-63b2-4df1-b0b1-832150a41befBuilds on5
- Quantum Cryptography in AlgorithmicaWilliam Kretschmer, Luowen Qian, Makrand Sinha, Avishay TalSTOC 2023 · 47 citations
- A One-Query Lower Bound for Unitary Synthesis and Breaking Quantum CryptographyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, John WrightSTOC 2024 · 14 citations
- Quantum Depth in the Random Oracle ModelAtul Singh Arora, Andrea Coladangelo, Matthew Coudron, Alexandru Gheorghiu et al.STOC 2023 · 11 citations
- Toward Better Depth Lower Bounds: A KRW-like theorem for Strong CompositionOr MeirFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Good Things Come to Those Who Wait - Dishonest-Majority Coin-Flipping Requires Delay FunctionsJoseph Bonneau, Benedikt Bünz, Miranda Christ, Yuval EfronEUROCRYPT 2025 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Space-Depth Trade-Off of CNOT Circuits in Quantum Logic SynthesisJiaqing Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Shang-Hua Teng, Bujiao Wu et al.SODA 2020 · 40 citations
- On the Computational Power of QAC0 with Barely Superlinear AncillaeAnurag Anshu, Yangjing Dong, Fengning Ou, Penghui YaoSTOC 2025 · 19 citations
- Optimizing quantum circuit synthesis for permutations using recursionCynthia Chen, Bruno Schmitt, Helena Zhang, Lev S. Bishop et al.DAC 2022 · 3 citations
- On the Pauli Spectrum of QAC0Shivam Nadimpalli, Natalie Parham, Francisca Vasconcelos, Henry YuenSTOC 2024 · 10 citations
- Quasi-polynomial Time Approximation of Output Probabilities of Geometrically-local, Shallow Quantum CircuitsNolan J. Coble, Matthew CoudronFOCS 2021 · 3 citations
