Optimal Space-Depth Trade-Off of CNOT Circuits in Quantum Logic Synthesis
Jiaqing Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Shang-Hua Teng, Bujiao Wu, Kewen Wu, Jialin Zhang
Abstract
Decoherence-in the current physical implementations of quantum computers-makes depth reduction a vital task in quantum-circuit design. Moore and Nilsson (SIAM Journal of Computing, 2001) demonstrated that additional qubits-known as ancillae-can be used to provide an extended space to parallelize quantum circuits. Specifically, they proved that, with O(n 2 ) ancillae, any n-qubit CNOT circuit can be transformed into an equivalent one of O(log n) depth. However, the near-term quantum technologies can only support a limited amount of qubits, making space-depth trade-off a fundamental research subject for quantum-circuit synthesis.
In this work, we establish an asymptotically optimal space-depth trade-off for CNOT circuits. We prove that any n-qubit CNOT circuit can be parallelized to O max log n, n 2 (n+m) log(n+m) depth with m ancillae. This bound is tight even if the task is expanded from exact synthesis to the approximation of CNOT circuits with arbitrary two-qubit quantum gates. Our result can be extended to stabilizer circuits via the reduction by Aaronson and Gottesman (Physical Review A, 2004). Furthermore, we provide hardness evidence for optimizing CNOT circuits in terms of size or depth.
Our result has improved upon two previous papers that motivated our work.
• Moore-Nilsson's construction (aforementioned) for O(log n)-depth CNOT circuit synthesis: We have reduced their need for ancillae by a factor of log 2 n by showing that m = O(n 2 / log 2 n) additional qubits-which is asymptotically optimal-suffice to build equivalent O(log n)-depth O(n 2 / log n)-size CNOT circuits.
• Patel-Markov-Hayes's construction (Quantum Information & Computation 2008) for m = 0: We have reduced their depth by a factor of n and achieved the asymptotically optimal bound of O(n/ log n).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af802e15-2340-4444-942c-9a0dbce1cf3bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Quantum Precomputation: Parallelizing Cascade Circuits and the Moore-Nilsson Conjecture Is FalseAdam Bene Watts, Charles R. Chen, J. William Helton, Joseph SloteSTOC 2026 · 1 citation
- Scalable Optimal Layout Synthesis for NISQ Quantum ProcessorsWan-Hsuan Lin, Jason Kimko, Bochen Tan, Nikolaj S. Bjørner et al.DAC 2023 · 34 citations
- On the Computational Power of QAC0 with Barely Superlinear AncillaeAnurag Anshu, Yangjing Dong, Fengning Ou, Penghui YaoSTOC 2025 · 19 citations
- Improved Lower Bounds for QAC0Malvika Raj Joshi, Avishay Tal, Francisca Vasconcelos, John WrightSTOC 2026 · 4 citations
- Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuitsYasuhiro Kondo, Ryuhei Mori, Ramis MovassaghFOCS 2021 · 14 citations
