Sorting through the noise: Testing robustness of information processing in pre-trained language models
Lalchand Pandia, Allyson Ettinger
Abstract
Pre-trained LMs have shown impressive performance on downstream NLP tasks, but we have yet to establish a clear understanding of their sophistication when it comes to processing, retaining, and applying information presented in their input. In this paper we tackle a component of this question by examining robustness of models' ability to deploy relevant context information in the face of distracting content. We present models with cloze tasks requiring use of critical context information, and introduce distracting content to test how robustly the models retain and use that critical information for prediction. We also systematically manipulate the nature of these distractors, to shed light on dynamics of models' use of contextual cues. We find that although models appear in simple contexts to make predictions based on understanding and applying relevant facts from prior context, the presence of distracting but irrelevant content has clear impact in confusing model predictions. In particular, models appear particularly susceptible to factors of semantic similarity and word position. The findings are consistent with the conclusion that LM predictions are driven in large part by superficial contextual cues, rather than by robust representations of context meaning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b57acbc0-b90c-4fcf-8aa4-839aea1dd700Cited by top-tier papers7
- Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant ContextFreda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales et al.ICML 2023 · 970 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
- Can Language Models Perform Robust Reasoning in Chain-of-thought Prompting with Noisy Rationales?Zhanke Zhou, Rong Tao, Jianing Zhu, Yiwen Luo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 74 citations
- Do LLMs dream of elephants (when told not to)? Latent concept association and associative memory in transformersYibo Jiang, Goutham Rajendran, Pradeep Ravikumar, Bryon AragamNeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
- Evaluation beyond Task Performance: Analyzing Concepts in AlphaZero in HexCharles Lovering, Jessica Zosa Forde, George Konidaris, Ellie Pavlick et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
Builds on2
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Spying on Your Neighbors: Fine-grained Probing of Contextual Embeddings for Information about Surrounding WordsJosef Klafka, Allyson EttingerACL 2020 · 2 citations
Related papers
- How Is LLM Reasoning Distracted by Irrelevant Context? An Analysis Using a Controlled BenchmarkMinglai Yang, Ethan Huang, Liang Zhang, Mihai Surdeanu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- Parallel Structures in Pre-training Data Yield In-Context LearningYanda Chen, Chen Zhao, Zhou Yu, Kathleen R. McKeown et al.ACL 2024 · 1 citation
- Clozing the Gap: Exploring Why Language Model Surprisal Outperforms Cloze SurprisalSathvik Nair, Byung-Doh OhACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree SearchYanbo Wang, Zixiang Xu, Yue Huang, Chujie Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- MASKER: Masked Keyword Regularization for Reliable Text ClassificationSeung Jun Moon, Sangwoo Mo, Kimin Lee, Jaeho Lee et al.AAAI 2021 · 39 citations
