Evaluation beyond Task Performance: Analyzing Concepts in AlphaZero in Hex
Charles Lovering, Jessica Zosa Forde, George Konidaris, Ellie Pavlick, Michael L. Littman
Abstract
AlphaZero, an approach to reinforcement learning that couples neural networks and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS), has produced state-of-the-art strategies for traditional board games like chess, Go, shogi, and Hex. While researchers and game commentators have suggested that AlphaZero uses concepts that humans consider important, it is unclear how these concepts are captured in the network. We investigate AlphaZero's internal representations in the game of Hex using two evaluation techniques from natural language processing (NLP): model probing and behavioral tests. In doing so, we introduce new evaluation tools to the RL community, and illustrate how evaluations other than task performance can be used to provide a more complete picture of a model's strengths and weaknesses. Our analyses in the game of Hex reveal interesting patterns and generate some testable hypotheses about how such models learn in general. For example, we find that MCTS discovers concepts before the neural network learns to encode them. We also find that concepts related to short-term end-game planning are best encoded in the final layers of the model, whereas concepts related to long-term planning are encoded in the middle layers of the model. https://bit.ly/alphatology https://github.com/jzf2101/alphatology * Equal contribution. 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 611fe181-b594-4cba-a97c-40fc52da04eeCited by top-tier papers5
- Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMsAngelica Chen, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Kyunghyun Cho, Matthew L. Leavitt et al.ICLR 2024 · 119 citations
- Hidden Breakthroughs in Language Model TrainingSara Kangaslahti, Elan Rosenfeld, Naomi SaphraICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- AlphaZero Neural Scaling and Zipf's Law: a Tale of Board Games and Power LawsOren Neumann, Claudius GrosNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Interpreting Emergent Planning in Model-Free Reinforcement LearningThomas Bush, Stephen Chung, Usman Anwar, Adrià Garriga-Alonso et al.ICLR 2025
- The Deleuzian Representation HypothesisClément Cornet, Romaric Besançon, Hervé Le BorgneICLR 2026
Builds on7
- A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language ModelsJennifer Hu, Jon Gauthier, Peng Qian, Ethan Wilcox et al.ACL 2020 · 124 citations
- Predicting Inductive Biases of Pre-Trained ModelsCharles Lovering, Rohan Jha, Tal Linzen, Ellie PavlickICLR 2021 · 70 citations
- Hyperparameter Optimization Is Deceiving Us, and How to Stop ItA. Feder Cooper, Yucheng Lu, Jessica Zosa Forde, Christopher De SaNeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
- Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description LengthElena Voita, Ivan TitovEMNLP 2020 · 34 citations
- Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value MemoriesMor Geva, Roei Schuster, Jonathan Berant, Omer LevyEMNLP 2021 · 33 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Learning for AlphaZero via Path ConsistencyDengwei Zhao, Shikui Tu, Lei XuICML 2022 · 8 citations
- Regret-Guided Search Control for Efficient Learning in AlphaZeroYun-Jui Tsai, Wei-Yu Chen, Yan-Ru Ju, Yu-Hung Chang et al.ICLR 2026
- Deep Reinforcement Learning for General Game PlayingAdrian Goldwaser, Michael ThielscherAAAI 2020 · 46 citations
- Monte-Carlo Tree Search as Regularized Policy OptimizationJean-Bastien Grill, Florent Altché, Yunhao Tang, Thomas Hubert et al.ICML 2020 · 84 citations
- Enhancing Chess Reinforcement Learning with Graph RepresentationTomas Rigaux, Hisashi KashimaNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
