AlphaZero Neural Scaling and Zipf's Law: a Tale of Board Games and Power Laws
Oren Neumann, Claudius Gros
Abstract
Neural scaling laws are observed in a range of domains, to date with no universal understanding of why they occur. Recent theories suggest that loss power laws arise from Zipf's law, a power law observed in domains like natural language. One theory suggests that language scaling laws emerge when Zipf-distributed task quanta are learned in descending order of frequency. In this paper we examine power-law scaling in AlphaZero, a reinforcement learning algorithm, using a model of language-model scaling. We find that game states in training and inference data scale with Zipf's law, which is known to arise from the tree structure of the environment, and examine the correlation between scaling-law and Zipf'slaw exponents. In agreement with the quanta scaling model, we find that agents optimize state loss in descending order of frequency, even though this order scales inversely with modelling complexity. We also find that inverse scaling, the failure of models to improve with size, is correlated with unusual Zipf curves where end-game states are among the most frequent states. We show evidence that larger models shift their focus to these less-important states, sacrificing their understanding of important early-game states.
- We find that AlphaZero agents that exhibit scaling laws, such as those trained in Neumann & Gros (2022) [5], produce train and test data that follows Zipf's law, suggesting that learned tasks also scale with Zipf's law. 2. We show how these smooth Zipf laws form when agent policies are combined with the tree-structure of board games, which is known to create a Zipf-like state distribution [23].
39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9e2bb346-5c7d-4ced-80fa-7d7664342391Cited by top-tier papers3
- From Mathematical Reasoning to Code: Generalization of Process Reward Models in Test-Time ScalingZhengyu Chen, Yudong Wang, Teng Xiao, Ruochen Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- Complexity Scaling Laws for Neural Models using Combinatorial OptimizationLowell Weissman, Michael Krumdick, A. Lynn AbbottNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- How Do Large Language Monkeys Get Their Power (Laws)?Rylan Schaeffer, Joshua Kazdan, John Hughes, Jordan Juravsky et al.ICML 2025
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural NetworksBlake Bordelon, Abdulkadir Canatar, Cengiz PehlevanICML 2020 · 245 citations
- The Quantization Model of Neural ScalingEric J. Michaud, Ziming Liu, Uzay Girit, Max TegmarkNeurIPS 2023 · 179 citations
- Implicit Under-Parameterization Inhibits Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Rishabh Agarwal, Dibya Ghosh, Sergey LevineICLR 2021 · 155 citations
Related papers
- Scaling Laws for a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning ModelOren Neumann, Claudius GrosICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Scaling Laws for Pre-training Agents and World ModelsTim Pearce, Tabish Rashid, David Bignell, Raluca Georgescu et al.ICML 2025
- Learning curves theory for hierarchically compositional data with power-law distributed featuresFrancesco Cagnetta, Hyunmo Kang, Matthieu WyartICML 2025
- Superposition Yields Robust Neural ScalingYizhou Liu, Ziming Liu, Jeff GoreNeurIPS 2025 · 36 citations
- Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's LawFrederik Kunstner, Francis BachNeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
