Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Law
Frederik Kunstner, Francis Bach
Abstract
Recent works have highlighted optimization difficulties faced by gradient descent in training the first and last layers of transformer-based language models, which are overcome by optimizers such as Adam. These works suggest that the difficulty is linked to the heavy-tailed distribution of words in text data, where the frequency of the th most frequent word is proportional to , following Zipf's law. To better understand the impact of the data distribution on training performance, we study a linear bigram model for next-token prediction when the tokens follow a power law parameterized by the exponent . We derive optimization scaling laws for deterministic gradient descent and sign descent as a proxy for Adam as a function of the exponent . Existing theoretical investigations in scaling laws assume that the eigenvalues of the data decay as a power law with exponent . This assumption effectively makes the problem finite dimensional'' as most of the loss comes from a few of the largest eigencomponents. In comparison, we show that the problem is more difficult when the data have heavier tails. The case $\alpha = 1$ as found in text data is worst-case'' for gradient descent, in that the number of iterations required to reach a small relative error scales almost linearly with dimension. While the performance of sign descent also depends on the dimension, for Zipf-distributed data the number of iterations scales only with the square-root of the dimension, leading to a large improvement for large vocabularies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 70c2e9a5-633c-432c-8cec-84da4235db30Cited by top-tier papers8
- Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning RegimeLeonardo Defilippis, Yizhou Xu, Julius Girardin, Vittorio Erba et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- Theory of Scaling Laws for In-Context Regression: Depth, Width, Context and TimeBlake Bordelon, Mary I. Letey, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Muon in Associative Memory Learning: Training Dynamics and Scaling LawsKaifei Wang, Binghui Li, Han Zhong, Pinyan Lu et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Fast Catch-Up, Late Switching: Optimal Batch Size Scheduling via Functional Scaling LawsJinbo Wang, Binghui Li, Zhanpeng Zhou, Mingze Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Single-Head Attention in High Dimensions: A Theory of Generalization, Weights Spectra, and Scaling LawsFabrizio Boncoraglio, Vittorio Erba, Emanuele Troiani, Yizhou Xu et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on21
- Symbolic Discovery of Optimization AlgorithmsXiangning Chen, Chen Liang, Da Huang, Esteban Real et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 734 citations
- A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across ScalesJonathan S. Rosenfeld, Amir Rosenfeld, Yonatan Belinkov, Nir ShavitICLR 2020 · 265 citations
- Understanding the Difficulty of Training TransformersLiyuan Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu Chen et al.EMNLP 2020 · 158 citations
- Scaling Laws with Vocabulary: Larger Models Deserve Larger VocabulariesChaofan Tao, Qian Liu, Longxu Dou, Niklas Muennighoff et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 135 citations
- On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient AlgorithmsSadhika Malladi, Kaifeng Lyu, Abhishek Panigrahi, Sanjeev AroraNeurIPS 2022 · 125 citations
Related papers
- Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language ModelsFrederik Kunstner, Alan Milligan, Robin Yadav, Mark Schmidt et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 100 citations
- Noise Is Not the Main Factor Behind the Gap Between Sgd and Adam on Transformers, But Sign Descent Might BeFrederik Kunstner, Jacques Chen, Jonathan Wilder Lavington, Mark SchmidtICLR 2023 · 5 citations
- Universal One-third Time Scaling in Learning Peaked DistributionsYizhou Liu, Ziming Liu, Cengiz Pehlevan, Jeff GoreICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Zipfian WhiteningSho Yokoi, Han Bao, Hiroto Kurita, Hidetoshi ShimodairaNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Deconstructing What Makes a Good Optimizer for Autoregressive Language ModelsRosie Zhao, Depen Morwani, David Brandfonbrener, Nikhil Vyas et al.ICLR 2025
