USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
Generated Data with Fake Privacy: Hidden Dangers of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Generated Data
Atilla Akkus, Masoud Poorghaffar Aghdam, Mingjie Li, Junjie Chu, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang, Sinem Sav
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant success in various domain-specific tasks, with their performance often improving substantially after fine-tuning. However, fine-tuning with real-world data introduces privacy risks. To mitigate these risks, developers increasingly rely on synthetic data generation as an alternative to using real data, as data generated by traditional models is believed to be different from real-world data. However, with the advanced capabilities of LLMs, the distinction between real data and data generated by these models has become nearly indistinguishable. This convergence introduces similar privacy risks for generated data to those associated with real data. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of this underexplored issue by investigating a key question: "Does fine-tuning with LLM-generated data enhance privacy, or does it pose additional privacy risks?" Our study investigates this question by examining the structural characteristics of data generated by LLMs, focusing on two primary fine-tuning approaches: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with unstructured (plain-text) generated data and self-instruct tuning. In the scenario of SFT, the data is put into a particular instruction tuning format used by previous studies. We use Personal Information Identifier (PII) leakage and Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on the Pythia Model Suite and Open Pre-trained Transformer (OPT) to measure privacy risks. Notably, after fine-tuning with unstructured generated data, the rate of successful PII extractions for Pythia increased by over 20%, highlighting the potential privacy implications of such approaches. Furthermore, the ROC-AUC score of MIAs for Pythia-6.9b, the second biggest model of the suite, increases over 40% after self-instruct tuning. Our results indicate the potential privacy risks associated with fine-tuning LLMs using generated data, underscoring the need for careful consideration of privacy safeguards in such approaches.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b3f18822-f4f1-4fbf-a8d0-839231be17ddCited by top-tier papers8
- Adjacent Words, Divergent Intents: Jailbreaking Large Language Models via Task ConcurrencyYukun Jiang, Mingjie Li, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
- A Guardrail for Safety Preservation: When Safety-Sensitive Subspace Meets Harmful-Resistant Null-SpaceBingjie Zhang, Yibo Yang, Renzhe, Dandan Guo et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Finding and Reactivating Post-Trained LLMs' Hidden Safety MechanismsMingjie Li, Wai Man Si, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Provably Protecting Fine-Tuned LLMs from Training Data Extraction while Preserving UtilityTom Segal, Yuval Elovici, Asaf ShabtaiICML 2026
- Effective PII Extraction from LLMs through Augmented Few-Shot LearningShuai Cheng, Shu Meng, Haitao Xu, Haoran Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2025
Builds on15
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic TextMatthieu Meeus, Lukas Wutschitz, Santiago Zanella-Béguelin, Shruti Tople et al.ICML 2025
- Privacy-Preserving Instructions for Aligning Large Language ModelsDa Yu, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Zheng XuICML 2024 · 41 citations
- Tab-MIA: A Benchmark Dataset for Membership Inference Attacks on Tabular Data in LLMsEyal German, Sagiv Antebi, Daniel Samira, Asaf Shabtai et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- The Janus Interface: How Fine-Tuning in Large Language Models Amplifies the Privacy RisksXiaoyi Chen, Siyuan Tang, Rui Zhu, Shijun Yan et al.CCS 2024 · 18 citations
- Forget to Flourish: Leveraging Machine-Unlearning on Pretrained Language Models for Privacy LeakageMd. Rafi Ur Rashid, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Ye Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 17 citations
