Tab-MIA: A Benchmark Dataset for Membership Inference Attacks on Tabular Data in LLMs
Eyal German, Sagiv Antebi, Daniel Samira, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trained on tabular data, which, unlike unstructured text, often contains personally identifiable information (PII) in a highly structured and explicit format. As a result, privacy risks arise, since sensitive records can be inadvertently retained by the model and exposed through data extraction or membership inference attacks (MIAs). While existing MIA methods primarily target textual content, their efficacy and threat implications may differ when applied to structured data, due to its limited content, diverse data types, unique value distributions, and column-level semantics. In this paper, we present Tab-MIA, a benchmark dataset for evaluating MIAs on tabular data in LLMs and demonstrate how it can be used. Tab-MIA comprises five data collections, each represented in six different encoding formats. Using our Tab-MIA benchmark, we conduct the first evaluation of state-of-the-art MIA methods on LLMs fine-tuned with tabular data across multiple encoding formats. In the evaluation, we analyze the memorization behavior of pretrained LLMs on structured data derived from Wikipedia tables. Our findings show that LLMs memorize tabular data in ways that vary across encoding formats, making them susceptible to extraction via MIAs. Even when fine-tuned for as few as three epochs, models exhibit high vulnerability, with AUROC scores approaching 90% in most cases. Tab-MIA enables systematic evaluation of these risks and provides a foundation for developing privacy-preserving methods for tabular data in LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
Related papers
- Decoding Web Memorization: A Semantic Membership Inference Attack on LLMsZhiyao Wu, Zi Liang, Haibo HuWWW 2026
- Fragments to Facts: Partial-Information Fragment Inference from LLMsLucas Rosenblatt, Bin Han, Robert Wolfe, Bill HoweICML 2025
- Membership Inference Attacks against Large Vision-Language ModelsZhan Li, Yongtao Wu, Yihang Chen, Francesco Tonin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 43 citations
- Forget to Flourish: Leveraging Machine-Unlearning on Pretrained Language Models for Privacy LeakageMd. Rafi Ur Rashid, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Ye Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 17 citations
- LOMIA: Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks against Pre-trained Large Vision-Language ModelsYihao Liu, Xinqi Lyu, Dong Wang, Yanjie Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
