Pulling Off The Mask: Forensic Analysis of the Deceptive Creator Wallets Behind Smart Contract Fraud
Mingxuan Yao, Runze Zhang, Haichuan Xu, Shih-Huan Chou, Varun Chowdhary Paturi, Amit Kumar Sikder, Brendan Saltaformaggio
Abstract
Criminals, using crypto wallets referred to as Deceptive Creator Wallets (DCWs), have orchestrated fraudulent activities by luring victims to transfer funds to fraud smart contracts. Since it is almost impossible to reverse the transactions or pinpoint the true identity of the criminals, the industry has turned to flagging such contracts as user warnings. However, current mitigation efforts focus on individual contracts, overlooking the DCWs behind the scenes. Consequently, our research found that this oversight allows fraud to thrive. To address this, we developed CoCo, an automated forensic analysis pipeline that processes a single fraud contract and generates evidence that the legal authorities need to mitigate the fraud. Applying CoCo to 157 confirmed fraud contracts, our research uncovered 1,283,198 associated contracts linked to 91 DCWs, responsible for 2,638,752 ETH ($2,089,504,682) in illicit profits. More alarmingly, CoCo traces the fraudulent activities back to September 2017. In response, we are closely collaborating with Etherscan and the FBI to combat the fraud identified in our study.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- DVa: Extracting Victims and Abuse Vectors from Android Accessibility MalwareHaichuan Xu, Mingxuan Yao, Runze Zhang, Mohamed Moustafa Dawoud et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 10 citations
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- Lock the Door But Keep the Window Open: Extracting App-Protected Accessibility Information from Browser-Rendered WebsitesHaichuan Xu, Runze Zhang, Mingxuan Yao, David Oygenblik et al.CCS 2025
- Identifying Incoherent Search Sessions: Search Click Fraud Remediation Under Real-World ConstraintsRunze Zhang, Ranjita Pai Sridhar, Mingxuan Yao, Zheng Yang et al.S&P 2025
- Enhanced Web Application Security Through Proactive Dead Drop Resolver RemediationJonathan Fuller, Mingxuan Yao, Saumya Agarwal, Srimanta Barua et al.CCS 2025
Builds on14
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- SOK: (State of) The Art of War: Offensive Techniques in Binary AnalysisYan Shoshitaishvili, Ruoyu Wang, Christopher Salls, Nick Stephens et al.S&P 2016 · 1,085 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- teEther: Gnawing at Ethereum to Automatically Exploit Smart ContractsJohannes Krupp, Christian RossowUSENIX Security 2018 · 345 citations
- TTAGN: Temporal Transaction Aggregation Graph Network for Ethereum Phishing Scams DetectionSijia Li, Gaopeng Gou, Chang Liu, Chengshang Hou et al.WWW 2022 · 156 citations
Related papers
- Interface Illusions: Uncovering the Rise of Visual Scams in Cryptocurrency WalletsGuoyi Ye, Geng Hong, Yuan Zhang, Min YangWWW 2024 · 7 citations
- Blockchain Address PoisoningTaro Tsuchiya, Jin-Dong Dong, Kyle Soska, Nicolas ChristinUSENIX Security 2025
- Characterizing Ethereum Address Poisoning AttackShixuan Guan, Kai LiCCS 2024 · 4 citations
- SmartCoCo: Checking Comment-Code Inconsistency in Smart Contracts via Constraint Propagation and BindingSicheng Hao, Yuhong Nan, Zibin Zheng, Xiaohui LiuASE 2023 · 7 citations
- Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners?Stefanos Chaliasos, Marcos Antonios Charalambous, Liyi Zhou, Rafaila Galanopoulou et al.ICSE 2024 · 49 citations
