Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners?
Stefanos Chaliasos, Marcos Antonios Charalambous, Liyi Zhou, Rafaila Galanopoulou, Arthur Gervais, Dimitris Mitropoulos, Benjamin Livshits
Abstract
The growth of the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem built on blockchain technology and smart contracts has led to an increased demand for secure and reliable smart contract development. However, attacks targeting smart contracts are increasing, causing an estimated 2.3 billion in losses, and a survey of 49 developers and auditors working in leading DeFi protocols. Our findings reveal a stark reality: the tools could have prevented a mere 8% of the attacks in our dataset, amounting to 2.3 billion in losses. Notably, all preventable attacks were related to reentrancy vulnerabilities. Furthermore, practitioners distinguish logic-related bugs and protocol layer vulnerabilities as significant threats that are not adequately addressed by existing security tools. Our results emphasize the need to develop specialized tools catering to the distinct demands and expectations of developers and auditors. Further, our study highlights the necessity for continuous advancements in security tools to effectively tackle the ever-evolving challenges confronting the DeFi ecosystem.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers13
- SCALM: Detecting Bad Practices in Smart Contracts Through LLMsZongwei Li, Xiaoqi Li, Wenkai Li, Xin WangAAAI 2025 · 40 citations
- SoK: What don't we know? Understanding Security Vulnerabilities in SNARKsStefanos Chaliasos, Jens Ernstberger, David Theodore, David Wong et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 32 citations
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools for Smart Contracts: How Far Are We?Kaixuan Li, Yue Xue, Sen Chen, Han Liu et al.FSE 2024 · 26 citations
- I Experienced More than 10 DeFi Scams: On DeFi Users' Perception of Security Breaches and CountermeasuresMingyi Liu, Jun Ho Huh, HyungSeok Han, Jaehyuk Lee et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 6 citations
- SolEval: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Repository-level Solidity Smart Contract GenerationZhiyuan Peng, Xin Yin, Rui Qian, Peiqin Lin et al.EMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on16
- Making Smart Contracts SmarterLoi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel, Prateek Saxena et al.CCS 2016 · 2,306 citations
- Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart ContractsPetar Tsankov, Andrei Marian Dan, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Arthur Gervais et al.CCS 2018 · 1,108 citations
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- ZEUS: Analyzing Safety of Smart ContractsSukrit Kalra, Seep Goel, Mohan Dhawan, Subodh SharmaNDSS 2018 · 595 citations
- Empirical review of automated analysis tools on 47, 587 Ethereum smart contractsThomas Durieux, João F. Ferreira, Rui Abreu, Pedro CruzICSE 2020 · 373 citations
Related papers
- Large-Scale Study of Vulnerability Scanners for Ethereum Smart ContractsChristoph Sendner, Lukas Petzi, Jasper Stang, Alexandra DmitrienkoS&P 2024 · 19 citations
- HOUSTON: Real-Time Anomaly Detection of Attacks against Ethereum DeFi ProtocolsDongyu Meng, Fabio Gritti, Robert McLaughlin, Nicola Ruaro et al.NDSS 2026 · 2 citations
- SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) AttacksLiyi Zhou, Xihan Xiong, Jens Ernstberger, Stefanos Chaliasos et al.S&P 2023
- Uncover the Premeditated Attacks: Detecting Exploitable Reentrancy Vulnerabilities by Identifying Attacker ContractsShuo Yang, Jiachi Chen, Mingyuan Huang, Zibin Zheng et al.ICSE 2024 · 24 citations
- Demystifying Exploitable Bugs in Smart ContractsZhuo Zhang, Brian Zhang, Wen Xu, Zhiqiang LinICSE 2023 · 80 citations
