Varifocal Question Generation for Fact-checking
Nedjma Ousidhoum, Zhangdie Yuan, Andreas Vlachos
Abstract
Fact-checking requires retrieving evidence related to a claim under investigation. The task can be formulated as question generation based on a claim, followed by question answering. However, recent question generation approaches assume that the answer is known and typically contained in a passage given as input, whereas such passages are what is being sought when verifying a claim. In this paper, we present Varifocal, a method that generates questions based on different focal points within a given claim, i.e. different spans of the claim and its metadata, such as its source and date. Our method outperforms previous work on a fact-checking question generation dataset on a wide range of automatic evaluation metrics. These results are corroborated by our manual evaluation, which indicates that our method generates more relevant and informative questions. We further demonstrate the potential of focal points in generating sets of clarification questions for product descriptions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b25a48cf-d840-4167-a0cd-59884e9f819aCited by top-tier papers5
- QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question GenerationWeiping Fu, Bifan Wei, Jianxiang Hu, Zhongmin Cai et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- "Image, Tell me your story!" Predicting the original meta-context of visual misinformationJonathan Tonglet, Marie-Francine Moens, Iryna GurevychEMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- TAIGR: Towards Modeling Influencer Content on Social Media via Structured, Pragmatic InferenceNishanth Sridhar Nakshatri, Eylon Caplan, Rajkumar Pujari, Dan GoldwasserACL 2026
- TSVer: A Benchmark for Fact Verification Against Time-Series EvidenceMarek Strong, Andreas VlachosEMNLP 2025
- The Psychology of Falsehood: A Human-Centric Survey of Misinformation DetectionArghodeep Nandi, Megha Sundriyal, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Jikai Sun et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on6
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text GenerationSumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,166 citations
- Generating Fact Checking BriefsAngela Fan, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Guillaume Wenzek et al.EMNLP 2020 · 39 citations
- Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through Step-by-Step RewritingYi Cheng, Siyao Li, Bang Liu, Ruihui Zhao et al.ACL 2021
Related papers
- Document-level Claim Extraction and Decontextualisation for Fact-CheckingZhenyun Deng, Michael Sejr Schlichtkrull, Andreas VlachosACL 2024 · 4 citations
- DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in DialoguePrakhar Gupta, Chien-Sheng Wu, Wenhao Liu, Caiming XiongACL 2022
- WatClaimCheck: A new Dataset for Claim Entailment and InferenceKashif Khan, Ruizhe Wang, Pascal PoupartACL 2022
- Towards Verifiable Text Generation with Evolving Memory and Self-ReflectionHao Sun, Hengyi Cai, Bo Wang, Yingyan Hou et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- Counterfactual Debiasing for Fact VerificationWeizhi Xu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Liang WangACL 2023 · 26 citations
