Generating Fact Checking Briefs
Angela Fan, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Guillaume Wenzek, Marzieh Saeidi, Andreas Vlachos, Antoine Bordes, Sebastian Riedel
Abstract
Fact checking at scale is difficult-while the number of active fact checking websites is growing, it remains too small for the needs of the contemporary media ecosystem. However, despite good intentions, contributions from volunteers are often error-prone, and thus in practice restricted to claim detection. We investigate how to increase the accuracy and efficiency of fact checking by providing information about the claim before performing the check, in the form of natural language briefs. We investigate passage-based briefs, containing a relevant passage from Wikipedia, entitycentric ones consisting of Wikipedia pages of mentioned entities, and Question-Answering Briefs, with questions decomposing the claim, and their answers. To produce QABriefs, we develop QABRIEFER, a model that generates a set of questions conditioned on the claim, searches the web for evidence, and generates answers. To train its components, we introduce QABRIEFDATASET which we collected via crowdsourcing. We show that fact checking with briefs -in particular QABriefs -increases the accuracy of crowdworkers by 10% while slightly decreasing the time taken. For volunteer (unpaid) fact checkers, QABriefs slightly increase accuracy and reduce the time required by around 20%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7ee6072b-941f-41d4-95d5-27850a04e446Cited by top-tier papers10
- FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text GenerationSewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis et al.EMNLP 2023 · 225 citations
- RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Zhuyun Dai, Panupong Pasupat, Anthony Chen et al.ACL 2023 · 90 citations
- Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex ClaimsJifan Chen, Aniruddh Sriram, Eunsol Choi, Greg DurrettEMNLP 2022 · 30 citations
- Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AIHoujiang Liu, Anubrata Das, Alexander Boltz, Didi Zhou et al.CSCW 2024 · 23 citations
- Varifocal Question Generation for Fact-checkingNedjma Ousidhoum, Zhangdie Yuan, Andreas VlachosEMNLP 2022 · 11 citations
Builds on2
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
- Can The Crowd Identify Misinformation Objectively?: The Effects of Judgment Scale and Assessor's BackgroundKevin Roitero, Michael Soprano, Shaoyang Fan, Damiano Spina et al.SIGIR 2020 · 2 citations
Related papers
- WatClaimCheck: A new Dataset for Claim Entailment and InferenceKashif Khan, Ruizhe Wang, Pascal PoupartACL 2022
- DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in DialoguePrakhar Gupta, Chien-Sheng Wu, Wenhao Liu, Caiming XiongACL 2022
- Factoring Fact-Checks: Structured Information Extraction from Fact-Checking ArticlesShan Jiang, Simon Baumgartner, Abe Ittycheriah, Cong YuWWW 2020 · 28 citations
- CFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification DatasetYing-Jia Lin, Chun-Yi Lin, Chia-Jen Yeh, Yi-Ting Li et al.AAAI 2024 · 8 citations
- DeSePtion: Dual Sequence Prediction and Adversarial Examples for Improved Fact-CheckingChristopher Hidey, Tuhin Chakrabarty, Tariq Alhindi, Siddharth Varia et al.ACL 2020 · 7 citations
