Anytime Safe PAC Efficient Reasoning
Chengyao Yu, Hao Zeng, Youxin Zhu, Jianguo Huang, Huajun Zeng, Bingyi Jing
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on complex tasks but suffer from high computational costs and latency. While selective thinking strategies improve efficiency by routing easy queries to non-thinking models, existing approaches often incur uncontrollable errors, especially in online settings where the performance loss of a non-thinking model is only partially observed and data are non-stationary. To address this, we propose Betting Probably Approximately Correct (B-PAC) reasoning , a principled method that enables anytime safe and efficient online reasoning under partial feedback. Specifically, we utilize inverse propensity scoring estimators to construct test supermartingales for candidate thresholds, and then dynamically adjust the routing threshold based on the accumulated statistical evidence of safety. Theoretically, we establish the anytime-valid performance loss control and the efficiency of B-PAC reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that B-PAC reasoning significantly reduces computational overhead, decreasing thinking model usage by up to 81.01%, while controlling the performance loss below the user-specified level.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b1955600-5dc0-4ae9-8c60-cb73b5871377Builds on9
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- Conformal Risk ControlAnastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Adam Fisch, Lihua Lei et al.ICLR 2024 · 242 citations
- Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World ModelShibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Jiahua Hong et al.EMNLP 2023 · 109 citations
- Think or Not? Exploring Thinking Efficiency in Large Reasoning Models via an Information-Theoretic LensXixian Yong, Xiao Zhou, Yingying Zhang, Jinlin Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 44 citations
- Probably Approximately Correct LabelsEmmanuel J Candes, Andrew Ilyas, Tijana ZrnicICML 2026 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Think Only When You Need with Large Hybrid-Reasoning ModelsLingjie Jiang, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Qingxiu Dong et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 71 citations
- Intervene When It Doubts: Conjunction-Guided Interactive ReasoningQianyue Wang, Jinwu Hu, Yaofo Chen, Yufeng Wang et al.ICML 2026
- REA-RL: Reflection-Aware Online Reinforcement Learning for Efficient ReasoningHexuan Deng, Wenxiang Jiao, Xuebo Liu, Jun Rao et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Training Language Models to Reason EfficientlyDaman Arora, Andrea ZanetteNeurIPS 2025 · 270 citations
- AdaReason: Progressive Training of Multi-LoRA Adapters for Budget-Adaptive Language Reasoning ModelsJiacheng Wang, Tianle Chen, Pengyu Cheng, Xiaofeng Hou et al.AAAI 2026
