Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacy
Antti Koskela, Marlon Tobaben, Antti Honkela
Abstract
Individual privacy accounting enables bounding differential privacy (DP) loss individually for each participant involved in the analysis. This can be informative as often the individual privacy losses are considerably smaller than those indicated by the DP bounds that are based on considering worst-case bounds at each data access. In order to account for the individual privacy losses in a principled manner, we need a privacy accountant for adaptive compositions of randomised mechanisms, where the loss incurred at a given data access is allowed to be smaller than the worst-case loss. This kind of analysis has been carried out for the Rényi differential privacy by Feldman and Zrnic (2021), however not yet for the so called optimal privacy accountants. We make first steps in this direction by providing a careful analysis using the Gaussian differential privacy which gives optimal bounds for the Gaussian mechanism, one of the most versatile DP mechanisms. This approach is based on determining a certain supermartingale for the hockey-stick divergence and on extending the Rényi divergence-based fully adaptive composition results by Feldman and Zrnic (2021) . We also consider measuring the individual (ε, δ)-privacy losses using the so called privacy loss distributions. With the help of the Blackwell theorem, we can then make use of the results of Feldman and Zrnic (2021) to construct an approximative individual (ε, δ)-accountant.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0ed1375-0cda-4ef8-a158-200539255f7aCited by top-tier papers5
- Fully-Adaptive Composition in Differential PrivacyJustin Whitehouse, Aaditya Ramdas, Ryan Rogers, Steven WuICML 2023 · 56 citations
- Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGDAnvith Thudi, Hengrui Jia, Casey Meehan, Ilia Shumailov et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 16 citations
- S-BDT: Distributed Differentially Private Boosted Decision TreesThorsten Peinemann, Moritz Kirschte, Joshua Stock, Carlos Cotrini et al.CCS 2024 · 1 citation
- Accuracy-First Rényi Differential Privacy and Post-Processing ImmunityOssi Räisä, Antti Koskela, Antti HonkelaICML 2026
- Free Record-Level Privacy Risk Evaluation Through Artifact-Based MethodsJoseph Pollock, Igor Shilov, Euodia Dodd, Yves-Alexandre de MontjoyeUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on6
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
- Numerical Composition of Differential PrivacySivakanth Gopi, Yin Tat Lee, Lukas WutschitzNeurIPS 2021 · 259 citations
- Individual Privacy Accounting via a Rényi FilterVitaly Feldman, Tijana ZrnicNeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
- Fully-Adaptive Composition in Differential PrivacyJustin Whitehouse, Aaditya Ramdas, Ryan Rogers, Steven WuICML 2023 · 56 citations
- Individual Sensitivity Preprocessing for Data PrivacyRachel Cummings, David DurfeeSODA 2020 · 29 citations
Related papers
- Optimal Differential Privacy Composition for Exponential MechanismsJinshuo Dong, David Durfee, Ryan RogersICML 2020 · 52 citations
- Tight on Budget?: Tight Bounds for r-Fold Approximate Differential PrivacySebastian Meiser, Esfandiar MohammadiCCS 2018 · 61 citations
- Efficient privacy loss accounting for subsampling and random allocationVitaly Feldman, Moshe ShenfeldICML 2026 · 5 citations
- The Saddle-Point Method in Differential PrivacyWael Alghamdi, Juan Felipe Gómez, Shahab Asoodeh, Flávio P. Calmon et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential PrivacyYi Liu, Ke Sun, Bei Jiang, Linglong KongNeurIPS 2022 · 10 citations
