USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
Free Record-Level Privacy Risk Evaluation Through Artifact-Based Methods
Joseph Pollock, Igor Shilov, Euodia Dodd, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye
Abstract
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are widely used to empirically assess privacy risks in machine learning models, both providing model-level vulnerability metrics and identifying the most vulnerable training samples. State-of-the-art methods, however, require training hundreds of shadow models with the same architecture as the target model. This makes the computational cost of assessing the privacy of models prohibitive for many practical applications, particularly when used iteratively as part of the model development process and for large models. We propose a novel approach for identifying the training samples most vulnerable to membership inference attacks by analyzing artifacts naturally available during the training process. Our method, Loss Trace Interquartile Range (LT-IQR), analyzes per-sample loss trajectories collected during model training to identify high-risk samples without requiring any additional model training. Through experiments on standard benchmarks, we demonstrate that LT-IQR achieves 92% precision@k=1% in identifying the samples most vulnerable to state-of-the-art MIAs. This result holds across datasets and model architectures with LT-IQR outperforming both traditional vulnerability metrics, such as loss, and lightweight MIAs using few shadow models. We also show LT-IQR to accurately identify points vulnerable to multiple MIA methods and perform ablation studies. We believe LT-IQR enables model developers to identify vulnerable training samples, for free, as part of the model development process. Our results emphasize the potential of artifact-based methods to efficiently evaluate privacy risks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on26
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Leaks by Adversaries: Adversarial Iterations for Membership Inference AttackJing Xue, Zhishen Sun, Haishan Ye, Luo Luo et al.AAAI 2026
- Order of Magnitude Speedups for LLM Membership InferenceRongting Zhang, Martin Bertran Lopez, Aaron RothEMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference AttacksSajjad Zarifzadeh, Philippe Liu, Reza ShokriICML 2024 · 92 citations
- Imitative Membership Inference AttackYuntao Du, Yuetian Chen, Hanshen Xiao, Bruno Ribeiro et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Membership Inference Attacks on Diffusion Models via Quantile RegressionShuai Tang, Steven Wu, Sergül Aydöre, Michael Kearns et al.ICML 2024 · 22 citations
