Individual Sensitivity Preprocessing for Data Privacy
Rachel Cummings, David Durfee
Abstract
The sensitivity metric in differential privacy, which is informally defined as the largest marginal change in output between neighboring databases, is of substantial significance in determining the accuracy of private data analyses. Techniques for improving accuracy when the average sensitivity is much smaller than the worst-case sensitivity have been developed within the differential privacy literature, including tools such as smooth sensitivity, Sample-and-Aggregate, Propose-Test-Release, and Lipschitz extensions.
In this work, we provide a new and general Sensitivity-Preprocessing framework for reducing sensitivity, where efficient application gives state-of-the-art accuracy for privately outputting the important statistical metrics median and mean when no underlying assumptions are made about the database. In particular, our framework compares favorably to smooth sensitivity for privately outputting median, in terms of both running time and accuracy. Furthermore, because our framework is a preprocessing step, it can also be complementary to smooth sensitivity and any other private mechanism, where applying both can achieve further gains in accuracy.
We additionally introduce a new notion of individual sensitivity and show that it is an important metric in the variant definition of personalized differential privacy. We show that our algorithm can extend to this context and serve as a useful tool for this variant definition and its applications in markets for privacy.
Given the effectiveness of our framework in these important statistical metrics, we further investigate its properties and show that: (1) Our construction is conducive to efficient implementation with strong accuracy guarantees, evidenced by an O(n) implementation for median (with presorted data), and O(n 2 ) implementation for more complicated functions such as mean, α-trimmed mean, and variance. (2) Our construction is both NP-hard and also optimal in the general setting (3) Our construction can be extended to higher dimensions, although it incurs accuracy loss that is linear in the dimension.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4177b129-4527-409b-916d-5111fbdfed15Cited by top-tier papers10
- Individual Privacy Accounting via a Rényi FilterVitaly Feldman, Tijana ZrnicNeurIPS 2021 · 124 citations
- Private Identity Testing for High-Dimensional DistributionsClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Audra McMillan, Jonathan R. Ullman et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 42 citations
- Optimal Private Median Estimation under Minimal Distributional AssumptionsChristos Tzamos, Emmanouil V. Vlatakis-Gkaragkounis, Ilias ZadikNeurIPS 2020 · 25 citations
- Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual ObservationPalak Jain, Adam Smith, Connor WagamanS&P 2024 · 11 citations
- Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private EstimationTravis Dick, Alex Kulesza, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha SureshICML 2023 · 10 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Smooth Sensitivity for Geo-PrivacyYuting Liang, Ke YiCCS 2024 · 1 citation
- DP-PQD: Privately Detecting Per-Query Gaps In Synthetic Data Generated By Black-Box MechanismsShweta Patwa, Danyu Sun, Amir Gilad, Ashwin Machanavajjhala et al.VLDB 2024 · 2 citations
- Instance-Specific Asymmetric Sensitivity in Differential PrivacyDavid DurfeeNeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation
- Addressing Sensitivity Distinction in Local Differential Privacy: A General Utility-Optimized FrameworkXingyu He, Youwen Zhu, Rongke Liu, Gaoning Pan et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
