Private Identity Testing for High-Dimensional Distributions
Clément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Audra McMillan, Jonathan R. Ullman, Lydia Zakynthinou
Abstract
In this work we present novel differentially private identity (goodness-of-fit) testers for natural and widely studied classes of multivariate product distributions: product distributions over ±1 d and Gaussians in R d with known covariance. Our testers have improved sample complexity compared to those derived from previous techniques, and are the first testers whose sample complexity matches the order-optimal minimax sample complexity of O(d 1/2 /α 2 ) in many parameter regimes. We construct two types of testers, exhibiting tradeoffs between sample complexity and computational complexity. Finally, we provide a two-way reduction between testing a subclass of multivariate product distributions and testing univariate distributions, and thereby obtain upper and lower bounds for testing this subclass of product distributions. of this work is to give novel algorithms for hypothesis testing problems on high-dimensional distributions with improved sample complexity. In particular, we give differentially private algorithms for the following natural and fundamental problems: 1. Given samples from a multivariate Gaussian P in R d whose covariance is known to be the identity, decide if P is N (0, I d×d ) or is α-far from N (0, I d×d ) in total variation distance. Or, equivalently, decide if 2. Given samples from a product distribution P over ±1 d , decide if P is the uniform distribution or is α-far from the uniform distribution in total variation distance. Or, equivalently, decide if 3. Given samples from a product distribution P over 0, 1 d , decide if P is equal to some given extremely biased distribution or is α-far from Q in total variation distance. In this case our tester achieves the provably optimal sample complexity. The main challenge in solving these high-dimensional testing problems privately is that the only known non-private test statistics for these problems have high worst-case sensitivity. That is, these test statistics can potentially be highly brittle to changing even a single one of the samples. We overcome this challenge by identifying two methods for reducing the sensitivity of the test statistic without substantially changing its average-case behavior on typical datasets sampled from the distributions we consider. The first is based on a novel private filtering method, which gives a computationally efficient tester. The second combines the method of Lipschitz extensions [BBDS13, KNRS13] with recursive preconditioning, which yields an exponential-time tester, but with improved sample complexity. Background: Private Hypothesis Testing We start by giving some background on private hypothesis testing. First, when we say that we want a differentially private hypothesis tester for a pair H 0 , H 1 over domain X , we mean that we seek an algorithm A : X * → 0, 1 such that
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f2ddc2c6-d143-49e2-935b-8e0dafe764a9Cited by top-tier papers11
- Robust and differentially private mean estimationXiyang Liu, Weihao Kong, Sham M. Kakade, Sewoong OhNeurIPS 2021 · 87 citations
- Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance EstimationGavin Brown, Marco Gaboardi, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. Ullman et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 59 citations
- From Robustness to Privacy and BackHilal Asi, Jonathan R. Ullman, Lydia ZakynthinouICML 2023 · 39 citations
- Unified Lower Bounds for Interactive High-dimensional Estimation under Information ConstraintsJayadev Acharya, Clément L. Canonne, Ziteng Sun, Himanshu TyagiNeurIPS 2023 · 35 citations
- The Test of Tests: A Framework for Differentially Private Hypothesis TestingZeki Kazan, Kaiyan Shi, Adam Groce, Andrew P. BrayICML 2023 · 15 citations
Builds on3
- Differentially Private Nonparametric Hypothesis TestingSimon Couch, Zeki Kazan, Kaiyan Shi, Andrew Bray et al.CCS 2019 · 51 citations
- Individual Sensitivity Preprocessing for Data PrivacyRachel Cummings, David DurfeeSODA 2020 · 29 citations
- Private stochastic convex optimization: optimal rates in linear timeVitaly Feldman, Tomer Koren, Kunal TalwarSTOC 2020 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Privately Estimating a Gaussian: Efficient, Robust, and OptimalDaniel Alabi, Pravesh K. Kothari, Pranay Tankala, Prayaag Venkat et al.STOC 2023 · 8 citations
- Dimension-free Private Mean Estimation for Anisotropic DistributionsYuval Dagan, Michael I. Jordan, Xuelin Yang, Lydia Zakynthinou et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Detecting Low-Degree TruncationAnindya De, Huan Li, Shivam Nadimpalli, Rocco A. ServedioSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
- Robustness Implies Privacy in Statistical EstimationSamuel B. Hopkins, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Shyam NarayananSTOC 2023 · 16 citations
- On the Sample Complexity of Privately Learning Axis-Aligned RectanglesMenachem Sadigurschi, Uri StemmerNeurIPS 2021 · 7 citations
