ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction
Yifei Liu, Yiquan Wu, Yating Zhang, Changlong Sun, Weiming Lu, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang
Abstract
Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b04e85b2-f10a-41f5-9e10-c40d24176e95Cited by top-tier papers10
- Explicitly Integrating Judgment Prediction with Legal Document Retrieval: A Law-Guided Generative ApproachWeicong Qin, Zelin Cao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si et al.SIGIR 2024 · 17 citations
- Legal Case Retrieval: A Survey of the State of the ArtYi Feng, Chuanyi Li, Vincent NgACL 2024 · 15 citations
- LegalReasoner: Step-wised Verification-Correction for Legal Judgment ReasoningWeijie Shi, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Mengze Li et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- De-biased Attention Supervision for Text Classification with CausalityYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Ziyu Zhao, Weiming Lu et al.AAAI 2024 · 10 citations
- AuG-KD: Anchor-Based Mixup Generation for Out-of-Domain Knowledge DistillationZihao Tang, Zheqi Lv, Shengyu Zhang, Yifan Zhou et al.ICLR 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on21
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence EmbeddingsTianyu Gao, Xingcheng Yao, Danqi ChenEMNLP 2021 · 2,496 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering DatasetHaoxi Zhong, Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Tianyang Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 212 citations
Related papers
- Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment PredictionNuo Xu, Pinghui Wang, Long Chen, Li Pan et al.ACL 2020 · 150 citations
- Legal Judgment Prediction via Relational LearningQian Dong, Shuzi NiuSIGIR 2021 · 53 citations
- NeurJudge: A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Legal Judgment PredictionLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Binbin Jin, Han Wu et al.SIGIR 2021 · 83 citations
- Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction FrameworkYiquan Wu, Yifei Liu, Weiming Lu, Yating Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 33 citations
- Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural NetworksLeilei Gan, Kun Kuang, Yi Yang, Fei WuAAAI 2021 · 72 citations
