ESCAPE: Countering Systematic Errors from Machine's Blind Spots via Interactive Visual Analysis
Yongsu Ahn, Yu-Ru Lin, Panpan Xu, Zeng Dai
Abstract
Classification models learn to generalize the associations between data samples and their target classes. However, researchers have increasingly observed that machine learning practice easily leads to systematic errors in AI applications, a phenomenon referred to as “AI blindspots.” Such blindspots arise when a model is trained with training samples (e.g., cat/dog classification) where important patterns (e.g., black cats) are missing or periphery/undesirable patterns (e.g., dogs with grass background) are misleading towards a certain class. Even more sophisticated techniques cannot guarantee to capture, reason about, and prevent the spurious associations. In this work, we propose ESCAPE, a visual analytic system that promotes a human-in-the-loop workflow for countering systematic errors. By allowing human users to easily inspect spurious associations, the system facilitates users to spontaneously recognize concepts associated misclassifications and evaluate mitigation strategies that can reduce biased associations. We also propose two statistical approaches, relative concept association to better quantify the associations between a concept and instances, and debias method to mitigate spurious associations. We demonstrate the utility of our proposed ESCAPE system and statistical measures through extensive evaluation including quantitative experiments, usage scenarios, expert interviews, and controlled user experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af5446c2-cab5-4349-9041-ec04bf6bfa93Cited by top-tier papers2
- Effective Human-AI Teams via Learned Natural Language Rules and OnboardingHussein Mozannar, Jimin J. Lee, Dennis Wei, Prasanna Sattigeri et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 28 citations
- Divisi: Interactive Search and Visualization for Scalable Exploratory Subgroup AnalysisVenkatesh Sivaraman, Zexuan Li, Adam PererCHI 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on10
- Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal EmbeddingsSabri Eyuboglu, Maya Varma, Khaled Kamal Saab, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck et al.ICLR 2022 · 178 citations
- Discovering and Validating AI Errors With Crowdsourced Failure ReportsÁngel Alexander Cabrera, Abraham J. Druck, Jason I. Hong, Adam PererCSCW 2021 · 60 citations
- Human-in-the-loop Extraction of Interpretable Concepts in Deep Learning ModelsZhenge Zhao, Panpan Xu, Carlos Scheidegger, Liu RenIEEE VIS 2021 · 59 citations
- Designing Alternative Representations of Confusion Matrices to Support Non-Expert Public Understanding of Algorithm PerformanceHong Shen, Haojian Jin, Ángel Alexander Cabrera, Adam Perer et al.CSCW 2020 · 52 citations
- ConceptExplainer: Interactive Explanation for Deep Neural Networks from a Concept PerspectiveJinbin Huang, Aditi Mishra, Bum Chul Kwon, Chris BryanIEEE VIS 2022 · 46 citations
Related papers
- V: Visual Aids for Identifying and Interpreting Spurious Associations in Data-Driven DecisionsXian Teng, Yongsu Ahn, Yu-Ru LinIEEE VIS 2023 · 3 citations
- Towards Visual Explainable Active Learning for Zero-Shot ClassificationShichao Jia, Zeyu Li, Nuo Chen, Jiawan ZhangIEEE VIS 2021 · 36 citations
- Background Invariance Testing According to Semantic ProximityZukang Liao, Min ChenICCV 2025
- D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic BiasBhavya Ghai, Klaus MuellerIEEE VIS 2022 · 45 citations
- Tracing and Visualizing Human-ML/AI Collaborative Processes through Artifacts of Data WorkJen Rogers, Anamaria CrisanCHI 2023 · 10 citations
